and wandering around randomly again... - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
How many times do you have to do this clown routine?
Logic has long been summed up, one would have the brains to understand.
So far, all the "logic" cited... have elegantly ended with the phrase, "when the price goes against you..."
And no one has yet to tell me what is so terrible then, if I am going to be happy to WAIT for this MOTION...
so you're living off the earnings?
I don't think I would say that.
I live off the income from a movement whose characteristics I just don't care about, let's say.
I don't care what his distribution... and all that other bullshit...
I probably wouldn't say that.
I live off the income from a movement whose characteristics I just don't care about, let's say.
I don't care what its distribution is... or whatever the hell it is...
Do you use one currency pair?
Do you use a single currency pair?
Yes... Exclusively.
You see, with my approach, there is no need to look for anything out of the ordinary.
I needed to find a good ratio of daily volatility to spread - so I chose the pound. (Although, it's really gone bad, lately, in that sense
)
I probably wouldn't say that.
I live off the income from a movement whose characteristics I just don't care about, let's say.
I don't care what its distribution is... or whatever the hell it is...
All you talk about is forum talk and theorizing, for months on the forum. You have yet to prove anything with practice.
Actually, it is theoretically possible to win at orljanka without martingale and infinite deposit, but, really, only in the limit. I have succeeded (on paper, of course), but the amount of winnings is not worth it.))
ZZY 5 years ago it was solved as an auxiliary problem. Now the technology has been lost, as it was no longer needed). In fact, the problem was, not how to win, but how to maximize the pleasure of limited funds).
At around the 1,024th, you'll have a case where you need to put all $1,024 on the line.
You've put all your money on the line and the roulette wheel is spinning. What's the probability that you'll win or lose? 1/2! It's either red or black, and you either lose all your money or you win an extra 1024 and go home with double the money.
So what's the point in going to the casino and putting all your money on the line and having a 1/2 chance of winning or losing?
You went to a casino. You played red and black. You had $1,024 with you.
At around 1,024 you will have to bet all 1,024 dollars. What is the probability that you will win or lose? 1/2, it's either red or black. You either lose all your money or you win an extra 1024 and go home with double the money.
So why jerk off a dollar when you can go to a casino and bet all your money at once and have a 1/2 chance of winning or losing?
Why, it's masochism, it's free booze. The game's not about winning.
You have been talking nonsense and theorizing for months on the forum. You have not proved anything with practice.
Amazing.
If a person says the simplest and ABSOLUTELY obvious things (like: two plus two is four), what proof do you need?!
You've got to use your brain sometime.
Maybe you see a mistake in what I said... Then show it to me.
Actually, it is theoretically possible to win at orljanka without martingale and infinite deposit, but, really, only in the limit. I have succeeded (on paper, of course), but the amount of winnings is not worth it.))
ZZY 5 years ago it was solved as an auxiliary problem. Now the technology has been lost, as it was no longer needed). In fact, the problem was not how to win, but how to maximize the pleasure of limited funds.)
Holy crap. You're cooler than Perelman. At least Perelman had time to submit his work before he gave up his Nobel Prize. You, on the other hand, throw the Nobel Prize in the trash, saying it wasn't needed.
But we will not let the talent perish.