Is there proof of profit from using Autotrading? - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What are you getting attached to the bank for?
The question was "is there a theory". You were shown proof of a theory that was smooth on paper, but you forgot about the ravines.
We can look for tougher proof - 100K bets in a row, not once lost, we have 100K bets net profit.
Showed what, what proof?
A complete scapegoat, not an advisor, if you say so openly and bluntly.
I wrote such a thing in the first class.
Purely my opinion.
But besides how to write an Expert Advisor, you need to know a lot of things not to screw up suddenly and unexpectedly.
The money is not given away so easily, you have to understand that.A total hoarding, not a counsellor, if you say so openly and bluntly.
I wrote that in first grade.
Purely my opinion.Are you referring to me or the advisor who said: "- 100K bets in a row, never lost, 100K bets net positive."
Are you talking about me, or is that the advisor: "- 100K bets in a row, never lost, 100K bets net positive."
You chop 50% in a day and enjoy two and a half years.
Get it?
Good luck!Did you get it?
NO. Although maybe he meant: You chop 50% in a day and enjoy six months.https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/165464/page391#comment_5000621
Are you referring to me or to the Expert Advisor: "- 100K bets in a row, never lost, have 100K bets net positive."
Again, this is the result of a simple martin advisor. If you want 0.9 non-display probability, then a 32M deposit is enough. If you want 0.95 non-display probability, then you have to have a 64M deposit, if you want 0.99 non-display probability - you have to have a 128M deposit. I do not remember the exact figures, but they are exactly of that order.
What is not "a winning, fully automatic strategy, giving 100K wins in a row with a probability 0.99"? In my opinion, such a probability of winning 100K wins in a row is the dream of any trader. And it is provided by a simple martingale, statistical proof - easy to deduce.
George Merts:
32M, 64M, 128M.
I'm not so good at Russian, how many M's is that?
I'm not that fluent in Russian, tell me the letter "M" is how much?
In fact, it's Latin for 'mega', a million. K is "kilo", a thousand.
Take a deposit of $32 million, and calmly put a TP of $1 (and a SL of $1). And go ahead, a perfectly normal martin.
Lose - you double the bet. Won - again bet $ 1. As a result, you have a 90% chance of not losing your 32 million in 100 thousand bets (and with a 10% chance all 32 million will be lost at one point). The winnings would be $100,000.
If you want to raise the probability to 99% - you need a deposit of 128 million.
In fact, it's Latin for 'mega', a million. K is "kilo", a thousand.
Take a deposit of $32 million, and calmly put a TP of $1 (and a SL of $1). And go ahead, a perfectly normal martin.
Lose - you double the bet. Won - again bet $ 1. As a result, you have a 90% chance of not losing your 32 million for 100 thousand bets. Your winnings will be $100,000.
If you lose, the next double bet is placed in which direction?
If you lose, the next double bet is placed in which direction?
Martingale doesn't care. Place your bets either way. That's the whole point of martingale - it's purely an MM strategy that doesn't depend on the symbol. Works on regular roulette too.
The idea is to take small frequent gains, and small frequent losses - to transfer to the zone of rare and big losses. It is necessary to transfer losses to the zone of such a rare big loss, so that it would not occur in a lifetime (for 100K bets) and stop playing before that moment. Necessary deposit is easy enough to calculate - ask the number of wins in a row, and the probability of not losing. And we get a quite normal theoretical justification.
If you lose, you double your bet. If you win, you bet $1 again. As a result you have a 90% probability you will not lose your 32 million for 100 thousand bets (and with a 10% probability all 32 million will be lost at one point). The winnings will be $100,000.