Donald - Nathanson - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Why you can't compare roulette and the forex market.
Let me give a simple example.
In forex, a trained trader can easily make 100 plus trades in a row, whereas in a casino this is unattainable even in the absolute sense of a terver.
Why is it impossible to compare roulette and the forex market.
Here's a simple example.
In forex, a trained trader can easily make 100 profitable trades in a row But in a casino it is unattainable even in the absolute sense of a terver.
So what?
What's up? Either you win 512 or lose 512 = double or lose money. Same as in a regular game.
What's up? Either you make 512 or you lose 512 = you either double or lose money. Same as in a regular game.
You're probably hooked on 512... change the record there...
You're probably stuck on 512... change the record there...
example-not to be fooled?
I won't point the finger, they'll think it's advertising. It's not hard to see for yourself in the signals what win-win series individual peeps are showing. You wouldn't believe it, even the ladies)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
I'm not going to point fingers, it may be considered as advertising. I'm not going to point the finger but it may be considered as advertising. You wouldn't believe it, even the ladies)))))))))))))))))))))))))))
that's a laugh before bedtime...thanks...when you have naive people, you don't need a petrosian)
i even know where such traders are trained...at harry potter college...a trained trader makes 100 profitable trades in a row...a slightly untrained trader makes 50 trades,
and the master trader who prepares such traders makes 1000 profitable trades at a time, and then he loses one time just for fun and to avoid getting bored...
If someone is making a big series of deals in their signals, he is waiting for the losses... Look at the drawdowns!
... they take maximal risks just to make the signal look nice and attractive, so to say, have a good look... while the average consumer doesn't care... the number of profitable deals hypnotizes him, he doesn't give a damn about drawdowns and huge risks...
Like what? Either 512 you make or 512 you lose = you either double or lose money. Same as in a normal game.
So? What's your point? As if no one here knows what Martingale is. Not only do they know about Martingale, they even know about Donald-Nathanson.
ps: in case you don't know, in maths there is no limit to the size of the number, in any of the three directions
that's a laugh before bedtime...thanks...when you have naive people, you don't need a petrosian)
i even know where such traders are trained...at harry potter college...a trained trader makes 100 profitable trades in a row...a slightly untrained trader makes 50 trades,
and the master trader who prepares such traders makes 1000 profitable trades at a time, and then he loses one time just for fun and to avoid getting bored...
If someone is making a big series of deals in their signals, he is waiting for the losses... Look at the drawdowns!
... they take on the maximum risk just to make the signal look nice and attractive, so to say, have the desired consumer appeal... while the average consumer doesn't care... the number of profitable deals hypnotizes him, he doesn't give a damn about drawdowns and huge risks...
About six years ago I saw a schoolboy make 109 profitable deals in a row on a contest account and his deposit was not unlimited and his profit was, if I remember correctly, 17000% per day. In roulette you willnever be able to achieve such a result.
Last year I watched a Chinese fellow demonstrating virtuosity. The gap from the second place was 15 times.
In forex with some experience you can do it, in roulette never.
In forex most price movements are not random. One TA is not enough to understand and justify it.
I don't consider a price movement in one tick.))) Here you will be indisputably right, that is, in fact, your roulette.
In my opinion, randomness is a rare regularity, which is indirectly proved by the Donald-Nathanson system. So in forex you could say there is a frequent rather than a rare pattern, if you look at it from that perspective.