Donald - Nathanson
a casino betting system invented by Donald and modified by the Russian mathematician Lev Nathanson...
what's the point:
1- the market randomly wanders like red/black in a casino (this is an important point! if this is not accepted, people inevitably slip into the illusion of predictability and go further and further into the forest of mathematical nonsense, thinking that the more complex they twist on the poop, the better).
Tractor F, for example, is already selling synchrophasatron, so keen that he's even stopped going to the showers... He rents a collider in Geneva for the day, accelerates elementary particles, then opens the blades and fires them directly to the forex)... the result: black holes in his pocket began to form... and a bald patch on the back of his head...
Ok ... let's move on:
2. identical stops (say sl 50p - tp 50p) spread is not counted yet!
3. the same ratio of profitable and losing trades (50/50).
4. the winnings will be exactly 50% of the bets. while stops are the same and the ratio of deals loss/profit is also the same ... although in a normal situation we would get exactly 0.
5. Proven mathematically...
I've tried this system before... it always pulls the account to the plus side, but... there is a large skew of losing trades over profitable ones and it should ideally be 50/50 not necessarily accurate just at least close to this distribution... then the system is guaranteed to win...
has anyone tried such a system?
any suggestions on how to prevent long series of losing trades?
the market is a random fluctuation ... but i have noticed the entry and direction need to be correct ... I've noticed that the entry and the direction need to be chosen... you can only think it's like a casino... you may or may not guess... if you just open from the window, it's even worse...
3. an equal ratio of profitable to losing trades (50/50).
A mistake here will result in a negative expectation and eventually a loss.
proven mathematically what?
What is there to try?
martingale doesn't give a positive mathematical expectation,
There's no system when playing against the house, you can only control your variance.
knock knock, who lives in the house? Before you write, read what's written...
we are talking about martingale?
The system does not allow for positive expectations when it comes to the opponent and it does not allow for any negative feedback. it's all there...
There is a mistake here - there will be a negative expectation and you will end up losing.
What the fuck are you talking about, sweetheart?
This will only work if you have an unlimited deposit. If you have a limited deposit, with a stop equal to profit, you should increase the number of positive trades to at least 60%-65%, ideally 70%. Or you have to increase stop profit to profit ratio 1 to 2 (ideally 1 to 3), then even having 40% of profitable trades we are in the end in profit. Proven in practice :)
facepalm....
i think i made this topic for nothing.... it's all bullshit... are you even familiar with donald nathanson's system????
....
i think i should have created this thread in the first place.... it's all bullshit... are you even familiar with donald nathanson's system????
It's a roulette system. What does it have to do with the market?
It's not a method - it's an illusion. You should take as many profits as you catch (3-4 less, to be exact, but it doesn't change the point). You can also use Martingale 3-4 times and then keep the last lot.
knock knock, who lives in the house? Before you write, read what's written...
Are we talking about martingale?
The main thing is that you can't read the text, you can't understand shit and you need to read the text first ... it's all there...
only a moron would waste time on a roulette system
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
a casino betting system invented by Donald and modified by the Russian mathematician Lev Nathanson...
what's the point:
1- the market randomly wanders like red/black in a casino (this is an important point! if this is not accepted, people inevitably slip into the illusion of predictability and go further and further into the forest of mathematical nonsense, thinking that the more complex they twist on the poop, the better).
Tractor F, for example, is already selling synchrophasatron, so keen that he's even stopped going to the showers... He rents a collider in Geneva for the day, accelerates elementary particles, then opens the blades and fires them directly to the forex)... the result: black holes in his pocket began to form... and a bald patch on the back of his head...
Ok ... let's move on:
2. identical stops (say sl 50p - tp 50p) spread is not counted yet!
3. the same ratio of profitable and losing trades (50/50).
4. the winnings will be exactly 50% of the bets. while stops are the same and the ratio of deals loss/profit is also the same ... although in a normal situation we would get exactly 0.
5. Proven mathematically...
i've tried this system before... it always pulls the account to the upside... but... there is a large skew of losing trades over profitable ones and it should ideally be 50/50 not necessarily accurate just at least close to this distribution... then the system is guaranteed to win...
has anyone tried such a system?
any suggestions on how to prevent long series of losing trades?