Registration for the MetaQuotes-Demo Championships in May - page 24
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This is a good idea and they will not play with lots, but will try to trade evenly, without big risks.
Yura, do not forget about the English side, there were also interested in it.
Priority 1 has the total amount of the Percentage of Profit indicator;
Priority No. 2 has the total amount of the Percentage of Maximum Relative Drawdown indicator;
Priority No.3 shall have the total amount of the Profit Factor index;
1. Formulas for calculating the indicators:
Percent Profit (%) Percent Profit = Total Net Profit / Initial Deposit x 100 (%),
where:
Initial Deposit - initial deposit;
Total Net Profit - the net profit, it shows the difference between the total profit and the total loss;
Total Net Profit = Gross Profit - Gross Loss, where Gross Profit - the total profit, the sum of profits of all profitable trades; Gross Loss - the total loss, the sum of losses of all losing trades.
To be honest, it's a bit complicated and I don't feel like it. Here, in a good way, you need to write a script:)
PS: although, there do simply through the detailed report in the terminal.
There is a "recovery factor" indicator, which already includes drawdown and profit.
It can be taken instead of the three priorities. I would also use the number of trades per period.
You can get a very good result on maximum volumes and four five trades in a month. But this result would be questionable in terms of luck. But the more trades, the more real statistics and the luck factor goes away.
I would take as a priority the number of deals multiplied by the recovery factor, well, you can also include Sharpe...
There is a "recovery factor" indicator, which already includes drawdown and profit.
It could be taken instead of the three priorities. I would also use the number of trades per period.
You can get a very good result on maximum volumes and four five trades in a month. But this result will be questionable in terms of luck. But the more trades, the more real statistics and the luck factor goes away.
I would take as a priority the number of deals multiplied by the recovery factor, well, you can also include Sharpe...
Number of trades you say)
Do you believe in a rare but accurate signal? And how do you check the quality of that signal?
Why THAT discrimination against the bloody dozen?
And, IMHO, already, the demo is rubbish.
There and the quotes and their speed and everything else...
Renat, welcome to the May Championship at number 13!
... Good! MT5 is gaining momentum, I do not understand those who are still sitting in a dying 4
All those who participated in April - move on to May. Who will be in May - automatically but at will in the next championship after May ...
Monitoring in May is planned similar to http://mvs.hol.es/Monitoring/ for May a different link is planned.
Trading Championship May
Necessary to open an account on the server MetaQuotes-Demo, deposit $ 10,000 leverage 100, trade can be on the platform mt5 ( hedge/netting) or mt4. register as a signal, and post the application in this thread.
The entry form is as follows. But you can do it in a looser form. IMPORTANT, do not start trading before 01.05.2017
User must be verified to exclude duplicate nicknames. 01.05.2017 - 02.06.2017.
There are no other restrictions.
The winner will be determined by the maximum equity on Friday 02.06.2017 after the end of the trading session.
You can register now, for MT4 terminals the problem with delays of quotes is solved.Trading Championship English https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/188046
Denis Chugrin
Alexander Ivanov
Vladimir Zubov
Serhii Shevchuk
Vladimir Gorbachev
Vladimir Gorbachev
This is the ranking on a point system
This is the ranking on a point system
That's how the ranking came out on the point system
In general all is correct. But it is more correct to calculate the score not by simply assigning it to a place, but by calculating it relative to the min/max of all competitors.
Example: 4 participants, equity 10000, 8000, 2000 and 0 correspondingly. According to point system, you will get points 4, 3, 2, 1.
I think we need to evaluate not the serial number of a criterion but its absolute value:
Distance 10000-0=10000;
10000/10000=1.0
8000/10000=0.8
2000/10000=0.2
0/10000=0.0
It turns out quite a different picture, so it takes into account the distances of the participants relative to max/min among all participants. And so for every criterion.
In addition you can enter importance coefficients for the criteria by which you multiply the obtained score.
In addition, some criteria should not participate in calculating the rating, as they duplicate other criteria, they should be shown in the table only as an informative indicator for visual evaluation, and not as a defining criterion in forming the rating.
Such calculation of a rating I suggested for FAO, I can make a table of the current competition as it will look this weekend. If anyone is interested, of course.
Example 1:
Example 2:
Looking at the last column, green is the best, red the worst. Depending on the parameter coefficient, the picture can change dramatically.
In general, ProjectAlbion shows remarkable results, balance increase combined with low drawdowns.
Note: In the table, the drawdown criterion should be taken from the signal values as the maximum over all time. And the current drawdown can be used as a visual indicator without taking part in the rating formation. The same applies to the current equity value only as an indicator for information.
It goes like this. (The table as a calculation example is not a final suggestion on rating calculation criteria). Accordingly it is still necessary to define the importance of criteria and assign them an appropriate coefficient.
ZS. came out faster than expected.