You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Again and again: forex is a lottery. In the words of the archimages
D)
No way.... isn't a lottery.
- There are no fish here, practically none...
-there are fish, you have to know how to catch them...
1.Yes you can, but first you should check the strategy 100,000 times.
2.Take it wisely, if your salary is more than 30 rubles, you can take 100 thousand a year (approximately) is if you live without a wife and children.
3.Divide the amount of 100,000, 70% for trade 30% for a share.
4.Strategy should operate on automatic (constantly sitting behind a computer will not work).
5.Strategy must bring something like 7-10% a day at a risk of losing 30% and then yes it makes sense, and all the rest is an illusion ...
7-10% a day.... this is where I'm going to stop and get out, I think))))
Look, above the branch one participant has already written a competent post about the interest. The point is to pay off the loan and not be left with an eighty-inch plasma alone, but to be left with a five-figure amount in the account, by the time the loan is paid off - already inflated to some six-figure amount. I.e., to pay off the loan with your own money (respectively, to take an amount commensurate with your capabilities), while the big deposit is growing in the account. At the same time, you have to withdraw funds from it little by little. If you do not withdraw money you will have to increase it for a long time, it is like reinvestment in the tester - at first there is a long horizontal line of increasing balance, and at the end it goes up.
And it's less risky for an experienced person than for a green beginner.
No way.... isn't a lottery.
- There are no fish here, practically none...
-there are fish -you have to know how to catch them...
- There's no fish there, I didn't bait there ©
It is possible, with a competent approach, to do so as well, the main thing is to understand what, where and why. But the only thing is that I wouldn't take it for signals.
If you have your own strategy that generates a stable income, it is probably better to actively search for investors. At the very least, you will probably have to pay back less interest on the capital you borrowed because the intermediary in the form of a bank will be removed from the chain.
Why the doubts about the signals? On the contrary, it seemed to me that our tops are better than all kinds of PAMMs (in terms of performance).
Not bad.
7-10% a day.... This is where I'll stop and get out, please))))
Look, higher up in the thread, one member has already written a competent post about interest. The point is to pay off the loan and not be left with an eighty-inch plasma alone, but to be left with a five-figure amount in the account, by the time the loan is paid off - already inflated to some six-figure amount. I.e., to pay off the loan with your own money (respectively, to take an amount commensurate with your capabilities), while the big deposit is growing in the account. At the same time, you have to withdraw funds from it little by little. If you do not withdraw money you will have to increase it for a long time, it is like reinvestment in the tester - at first there is a long horizontal line of increasing balance, and at the end it goes up.
And it's less risky for an experienced person than for a green beginner.
7-10% a day is realistic
This is a mathematical calculation (though virtual).
Signals say that you can make money that way.
-You have to understand the depths of our depths ......
Why the doubts about the signals? On the contrary, it seemed to me that our tops are better than all kinds of PAMMs (in terms of indicators).