Damned Martin - page 32
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Is the result the same when tested on all ticks?
You need to see an oculist, your eyesight is failing you. Yusuf is testing at OPEN PRICES like many other coders. This is quite normal practice if the EA algorithm is written in such a way that it only trades at the opening of a new bar.
And the checkpoints are different, to understand the difference read the user manual of the terminal.
Isn't the opening price one of the 4 checkpoints?
Do you think the result of Yusuf's example will be any different in terms of checkpoints and opening prices? Don't get hung up on words... You may need to see an oculist, but not because of this...
Isn't the opening price one of the four control points?
Do you think the result of Yusuf's example will be any different in terms of control points and opening prices? Don't get hung up on words... You may need to see an eye doctor, but not because of this...
By the way, can someone explain the difference between the open, close, max, min and any other price within a candle? Why is there such an attachment to these prices?
Because these are the prices that form the bar (candlestick).
By the way, can someone explain the difference between the open, close, max, min and any other price within a candle? Why is there such an attachment to these prices?
I've never understood such an attachment either...
and why would you want to martin to such figures?
By the way, can someone explain the difference between the open, close, max, min and any other price within a candle? Why is there such an attachment to these particular prices?
not really answering your question but... because the open time of a candlestick and the price at that time are known, unlike the high and low
not really answering your question but... Because the opening time of a candle and the price at that time are known, unlike the highs and lows.
Probably because the big players like round price levels, round time points.
Can someone please throw in an averaging tool:
Opens trades in direction of EMA 5, 20, 80 fan opening on TF D1, H4, H1, M15.
If on some TF 5 has crossed 20 towards 80, then there is no signal.
The point is that all aggressive traders (and tops too), are killed by the H4-D1 level momentum that shoots out without enough corrections. And the directional movement of large TFs seems to go long, hours, days and weeks accordingly. But, technically there is no weekly movement on a low TF without pulling back (unless there is a catastrophe of the universal scale). And, for a D1 wave to take place, there needs to be a H4-H1 zigzag (ABC), and there needs to be a slight correction before going into a further peak or rise.
In short, in simple words - the bloody wagons show which way to open and, if we fail to enter the position and a giant move in the opposite direction begins, a pre-wave in our direction will close our losing series in profit. At this point, some flies will cross, so we will safely reverse into the direction of the big move and safely lead it.
There will be a trend averaging, not a flat/channel/contraction one as is usually the case (our Taras is a prime example of this).