The philosophy of algotrading - page 10

New comment
 
Alexey Volchanskiy:

So what's next? Is this another forex owner in your hypotheticals? The usual aims of a major international bank.

And there is something wrong with their stabilisation, don't you think?

You just need a rational part of your head and that is all - the golden words ofRenat Fatkhullin.

1. The owner is permanent, he cannot be regular in essence, only the names change.

2) An ordinary bank, even a big one, cannot do this, it can only cheat and then the owner catches him anyway and punishes him with fines.

3. no, I do not.

Added . They see everything, how much and where someone has, even in what way.)

 
Alexey Volchanskiy:

The water level in the sea is the same, a couple or three metres for waves and tides don't count. Who commands the water? ))

Financial markets are so interconnected that large differences in quotes cannot technically arise. The law of communicating vessels, if you don't like the sea analogy.

the moon
 
Alexey Volchanskiy:
None. German is even worse for songs than Morse code ))
 
Yuriy Zaytsev:

This is our future.

Not only is time moving forward, but it's also speeding up! )

 
Yuriy Zaytsev:

Regarding your question about whether human psychology can be programmed.

Tomorrow I will write my concept of how this could be done.

 
Vladimir Zubov:
Have you done it yourself, studying the market, the competition, supply and demand in a particular location? Do you think it's easy to bring a product closer to your home that you might not buy, or is it not a job?
Yes, shuttlemaker in those turbulent years, no doubt bad or rather hard work, but it gives freedom of movement and self-confidence ... the wolf feet, and the merchant creativity and quick thinking feeds, and the legs as well ... of course there are far fewer opportunities now - everything is taken care of, the cops and officials are paid off... you can't poke your nose in, the bureaucracy is terrible... there used to be more freedom...
 
Yuriy Zaytsev:
the moon
 
Реter Konow:

This is our future.

Not only is time moving forward, but it's also speeding up! )

If you make a human being robot-like, he'll probably go crazy... ...or he'll throw himself at everyone like a zombie - no sense of fear, no feeling at all...
 
Сергей Криушин:
If you make a human being robot-like, he would probably go mad... Or he would throw himself at everyone like a zombie - there would be no sense of fear and no feelings at all...
eh... so humans are only controlled by feelings, mostly fear? %)
and robots attack people?
 
fxsaber:

Interest in algotrading is based solely on greed. There is nothing wrong with doing science because it generates interest. It cannot be interesting to engage in algotrading for reasons other than money.

There is no upside to algotrading.

In South-East Asian countries gambling is treated in a sacred way. For example, if you have won, it means that the spirits of your ancestors support you. There's a lot of religious considerations there. That's why a great number of people living on that territory regularly lose their hard-earned money.

This might seem to be a disadvantage were it not for the explanation of the mechanism by way of example. Factory workers are demanding a pay rise. The boss eventually makes concessions, but hires/creates gambling places where the workers shed as much on average as the wages were raised. And the factory ends up staying afloat as it doesn't lose the money it needs for its development.

Or, for example, solid gambling clubs in those regions can serve as hidden social tax agents. They legally take money from the population through games, which the population is not able to spend rationally, and spend it on public needs: supporting education, building sports facilities, etc.

But even such examples do not concern algotrading in any way.

If you view algotrading as a kind of task, a workout for the mind, then it becomes very useful and interesting in and of itself, like chess for example.

As for the "parasitism" of participants in electronic trading, this is probably one of the most honest ways of trading in general, because it does not involve scoring as a mandatory abutment of the modern economy in the form of advertising. Besides, the market participants have equal conditions (we do not take into consideration brokers, market makers, etc. as equal participants).

Besides all companies providing financial services are obligatory registered officially, and this means they bring income to the state in form of taxes. And traders themselves pay taxes (at least those who pay can with clear conscience not consider themselves parasites). So grandmothers get their pensions, civil servants and other freeloaders (many of them are really parasites) get their salaries, then they spend them on goods, thereby improving the economy.

In this way, alt-traders in particular, and traders in general, are essentially additional "heat pipes" that make money "flow", "work" in the economy.
The trader is the friend of man and the sanitary of the forest (the economy).
In addition, not all traders are by nature crooks, some are well-meaning - to give their children what they need, to buy kidneys for the needy in their city, etc., otherwise, what is the point of having money?

1...345678910111213141516
New comment