![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So what's next? Is this another forex owner in your hypotheticals? The usual aims of a major international bank.
And there is something wrong with their stabilisation, don't you think?
You just need a rational part of your head and that is all - the golden words ofRenat Fatkhullin.
1. The owner is permanent, he cannot be regular in essence, only the names change.
2) An ordinary bank, even a big one, cannot do this, it can only cheat and then the owner catches him anyway and punishes him with fines.
3. no, I do not.
Added . They see everything, how much and where someone has, even in what way.)
The water level in the sea is the same, a couple or three metres for waves and tides don't count. Who commands the water? ))
Financial markets are so interconnected that large differences in quotes cannot technically arise. The law of communicating vessels, if you don't like the sea analogy.
None. German is even worse for songs than Morse code ))
This is our future.
Not only is time moving forward, but it's also speeding up! )
Regarding your question about whether human psychology can be programmed.
Tomorrow I will write my concept of how this could be done.
Have you done it yourself, studying the market, the competition, supply and demand in a particular location? Do you think it's easy to bring a product closer to your home that you might not buy, or is it not a job?
the moon
This is our future.
Not only is time moving forward, but it's also speeding up! )
If you make a human being robot-like, he would probably go mad... Or he would throw himself at everyone like a zombie - there would be no sense of fear and no feelings at all...
and robots attack people?
Interest in algotrading is based solely on greed. There is nothing wrong with doing science because it generates interest. It cannot be interesting to engage in algotrading for reasons other than money.
There is no upside to algotrading.
In South-East Asian countries gambling is treated in a sacred way. For example, if you have won, it means that the spirits of your ancestors support you. There's a lot of religious considerations there. That's why a great number of people living on that territory regularly lose their hard-earned money.
This might seem to be a disadvantage were it not for the explanation of the mechanism by way of example. Factory workers are demanding a pay rise. The boss eventually makes concessions, but hires/creates gambling places where the workers shed as much on average as the wages were raised. And the factory ends up staying afloat as it doesn't lose the money it needs for its development.
Or, for example, solid gambling clubs in those regions can serve as hidden social tax agents. They legally take money from the population through games, which the population is not able to spend rationally, and spend it on public needs: supporting education, building sports facilities, etc.
But even such examples do not concern algotrading in any way.