You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I don't use anything but MT
Do you have any programming experience? At least at the level of memories of school and pascal.
I don't know anything, I've learned MQL, I'm just trying to make some money ;-)
they didn't start with zero knowledge of programming.
Some teach the basics at school, not to mention universities,
someone built websites, someone worked on MathLab, maintained 1C, automated the office.
Do you have any programming experience? At least at the level of memories of school and pascal
People here are just bluffing, saying that they "didn't know anything, learned MQL, making money" ;-)
they didn't start with zero knowledge of programming.
some people teach the basics at school, not to mention universities,
someone built websites, someone worked on MathLab, maintained 1C, automated the office.
It's the code again!!! I have questions: "What are the lines? Why two? Why to the right? What if three to the right? What if four to the left? What if it's two straight? What about the plus sign? Why are there so many minuses? What's a minus? What is it for?" ,,,,,, And this is just the beginning of MMM "
They say: "Ask questions" And when you ask them, they say: "The F1 handbook will help you" But the F1 handbook is at its own pace and it doesn't care about my questions ............
That's absolutely right ! Why answer what is written in the handbook?
The question "what are the dashes" - did you point to these dashes? Did you press F1? Did you read what they told you about the dashes? You have to chew the food you put in your mouth...
You want to learn? What's the teacher's question? "What's the line, what does it say about it in the Help?"
What's your answer?
Yes, it seems that up to the real code writing and will not get to, sent a comrade to read a multi-volume Knuth )), left to fill the references to many thousands of English self-study (apparently also there is a problem, since "single quote needed" == "brick"). At the same time it would be nice to have another famous book "The Art of Circuitry" (preferably in the original English, of course), to represent the computer at the lowest (most basic) level.
Oh, come on. Basic programming, even from this level, a month at the most.
And you don't need any books at all. There's the Internet, and there's more than enough to reach the "programming basics" level.
Oh, come on. Basic programming, even from this level, a month at the most.
And you don't need any books at all. The Internet is there, and there's more than enough to reach the 'programming basics' level, if you wanted to.
Oh, come on. Basic programming, even from this level, a month at the most.
And you don't need any books at all. The Internet is there, and there's more than enough to reach the 'programming basics' level, if you wanted to.
That's my point exactly. But it is persistently thrown to the grenade. In the end, you will be left with a residue - programming is a pain, and the desire will disappear at some 3rd volume.
Yes, it seems that up to real code writing will not come to this. I have sent my friend to read Knuth's multi-volume book )), now he should fill him with references to many thousands of English textbooks (apparently, he is in trouble there too, as "single quote needed" == "brick"). At the same time it would be nice to have another famous book "The Art of Circuitry" (preferably in the original English, of course), to represent the computer at the lowest (most basic) level.
The Art of Circuitry is still at home from my youth, a 3 volume book. It has nothing to do with computers, it describes ancient 8-bit microprocessors, that's all. Mostly analogue circuitry. Otherwise, yeah, it's a good three-volume book.