What is the optimum depth of history for identifying a useful signal? - page 18
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I took the long story to paint the story.
1-May I explain this very meaningful sentence?
2-All the same, you can answer the previous specifically posed question from the previous post:"or about your own https://forum.mql4.com/ru/42459/page2#503868 for example on this picture for m1 what history did you take, 64 bars is not it????? if your slowest blue line has a period far beyond hundreds of bars..."."
Good day ...
If you tell me what the long history gives you, if an EA doesn't remember it, you may say it's for stop and take... volatility is always changing ...
If you don't remember the length of the history, it's when and how to enter the market ...
Your words"In the future there will be a method that will stupidly set stops and takes only depending on the depth of history. Because it's the depth that determines the level of stops and takes".
and it's"And it's not about the depth of history at all"...
At least I didn't skip my logic lessons...
Whatever they are, they are of no use, they will not be evidence, and you need evidence, which, I repeat, is not from you.
And in general, if you have not noticed, I actually put a question originally, the reader, and in the end the reader not only did not prove anything and did not answer the question on the merits, but in response he even accused the questioner of lack of evidence. In other words, I still owe him for asking))))