Is it possible to code an EA for MT4, which would trade on the real as in the tester using control points? - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
:)))
This is where it gets interesting. In the process of creating and testing EAs, we prepare their cheating code in advance, don't we? :)
Yeah. If we don't know how to use the tester. The developers removed this mode from the terminal, but at the request of the public it was brought back.
If you are suddenly deceived, there may be two cases:
1. you have been cheated.
2. you are a sucker.
Question on your post - "the expert in the test will sell at 20, 25, 30, 50, etc., depending on where the bar is high," it turns out if you enter in the code to sell AFTER 20 with " sell at 20, 25, 30, 50, etc., depending on where the bar is high," then the assumption will happen a typical situation as in the test? To rule out the option of "And in reality will sell at 20".?
If you are suddenly deceived, there may be two cases:
1. you have been cheated.
2. you are a sucker.
Answered already. You should enrol in a psychic course...
You are straying away from the topic - how to implement real-time simulation by control points. What you have posted in these posts is irrelevant to the implementation. :)
You are straying away from the subject of how to implement a real-time checkpoint simulation. What you have posted is not relevant to the implementation. :)
You are going off-topic and you have already been answered many times by many people.
You are straying away from the subject of how to implement a real-time checkpoint simulation. What you have posted is not relevant to the implementation. :)
Let me explain popularly. The checkpoint mode uses high and low bar, which is unknown to mere mortals in real time. If you know it for some reason, then the implementation is a piece of cake.
You are going off-topic and you have been answered many times by many people.
Thank you all for paying attention to this topic. It was interesting to ponder over such a situation. I'll have to think about a time machine on this issue too if there's no other way to simulate such a real trade. :)
Let me explain in popular terms. The checkpoint mode uses a high and low bar that is unknown to mere mortals in real time. If you know it for some reason, the implementation is a piece of cake.
In this case, the questions to the developers must be why the tester works on the future and not on the present. What is the purpose of such organization of testing and optimization of parameters if the terminal is not a time machine? :)
In this case, the questions for the developers must be why the tester works on the future and not on the present. What is the purpose of the testing. :)
The tester works on whatever you tell it to work on.
Testing rules not to be painful have been written dozens of times.
The correct tests coincide 100% with the real trade, except for the days when you don't trade.
The tester works on whatever you tell him to work on.
Testing rules not to be excruciatingly written dozens of times.
The right tests are 100% the same as the real trade, except for the days when you don't trade.
"The tester works on whatever you tell him to."
The key point here is, - we do not explicitly or implicitly tell the tester to work on the future. :)