The councillor is in agreement. - page 2

New comment
 
The complexity of a system is greater than the sum of the complexities of its elements.
 
To avoid stepping on old rakes (and not just rakes) - https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/128859
 

Okay, well...

Then we simplify the task as much as possible.

We know in the tester the value of the first bar close in the future. (From our own quote file. )

The profitable Expert Advisor will already be...

The task is to write the most profitable Expert Advisor with a minimum stop.

We are working on the clock. Profit more than the stop, times better.

 
TVA_11:

Okay, well...

Then we simplify the task as much as possible.

We know in the tester the value of the first bar close in the future. (From our own quote file. )

The profitable Expert Advisor will already be...

The task is to write the most profitable Expert Advisor with a minimum stop.

We are working on the clock. Profit more than the stop, times better.


What do you mean by most profitable? Under the given conditions, an EA of two lines will earn 100500 percent a year, and it doesn't matter what kind of stop, even if there is no stop at all!
 
TVA_11:

Okay, well...

Then we simplify the task as much as possible.

We know in the tester the value of the first bar close in the future. (From our own quote file. )

The profitable Expert Advisor will already be...

The task is to write the most profitable Expert Advisor with a minimum stop.

We are working on the clock. Profit more than the stop, times better.


Do you want it for a tester?
 

Well I would of course like to say that I have a secret metatrader function capable of predicting a -1 bar close, but alas )

Yes, for a tester.

EA quality is easy to check... Instead of -1 bar, feed it with -2, -3, etc.

 
What's the point of writing an article or a dissertation, it's useless in the real world.
 

This is an objective way of checking the advisor.

My guess is that even knowing the future, it will not be possible to write a good EA.

 
TVA_11:  This is an objective way to test an EA.

My assumption is that even knowing the future, you cannot write a good EA.


It's you who are unfamiliar with the tester's grails, codebase is like a dog out of luck. Every third person here is good at it :)
 
123456789...11
New comment