Cure conspiracy theory - page 9
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Topikstarter:
Of course, it is preferable to use a dynamic stop, which is always physically justified. They can play against you if they want to, but it's either aerobatics (predicting your behaviour based on market forecasting, eventuality) or obvious rudeness. And on top (outside) invisible to the broker dynamic stop, I recommend placing a static (stop loss). I place it at the level of the previous dynamic, but taste and colour ... :)
One more thing: are you sure you're setting the stops correctly?
Topikstarter:
One more thing: are you sure you're setting the stops correctly?
_ the use of a dynamic stop, which is always physically justified, is preferable. _
One more thing: are you sure you are setting the stops correctly?
About the highlighted one, can you elaborate?
Let's wake up Peter :)
Dynamic stop: an event that deliberately cancels the signal to open a position.
Dynamic stop: an event that deliberately cancels the signal to open a position.
Let's take our favourite "1-2-3".
The pattern is a reversal, but if the price breaks the pattern start level, it is not a reversal, but a correction.
Stop (dynamic) - 1 pip outside the pattern start level. Physically, its penetration will mean the nullity of the pattern, and we know this before we place the order.
Stop loss - at the level of the start of the previous pattern.
No way! That's crazy. That's nonsense ...... and has it been recorded by anyone?... that the same dtz had different quotes from different clients?
Who are you?
Perhaps the puppeteer bribed the councillor by discreetly giving him a moose. So he works for the puppeteer.
An advisor needs to be fed. Best with brains.