Someone does not like the work of the moderators. Suggesting in private to take part in moderator ranking. I suggest not getting involved in this bullshit.
The usual ways of contacting Roche or Renate to offend don't seem to work.
Unfortunately I couldn't vote, I couldn't find a suitable item - "All of those listed". I have not been banned yet, so all are good. So, whoever has made more bans during their time as a moderator is the more objective:)
Paragraph 3.3 of the Rules.
What kind of questions could there be?
We'll keep that in mind for the future, sorry.
In addition, I find some things I would, if I got a ban for, I wouldn't mind at all. So, moderation is more than democratic. If someone here got a ban, that's a very serious sign.
But being democratic doesn't mean objectivity.
What happened?
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
Someone does not like the work of the moderators. Suggesting in private to take part in moderator ranking. I suggest not getting involved in this bullshit.
The usual ways of contacting Roche or Renate to offend don't seem to work.