You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
IMHO, and with all due respect to the exact sciences, it is a common misconception to try to represent the market in terms of radio electronics, physics or cybernetics. A person who has gained knowledge and experience in one area is trying to use it in another. But they are different areas. Knowledge and experience in one means nothing in the other. The market is not DSP, and transistors and clock generators are not the market. A simple awareness of this fact is very conducive to success in the area in which you need to succeed.
IMHO, and with all due respect to the exact sciences, it is a common misconception to try to represent the market in terms of radio electronics, physics or cybernetics. A person who has gained knowledge and experience in one area is trying to find applications for them in another.But these are different areas . Knowledge and experience in one means nothing in the other.
And you can certainly explain how the price graph is fundamentally different from the signal graph at the output of a broadband receiver.
If not, then the above is mere demagoguery.
And you can certainly explain how the price graph is fundamentally different from the signal graph at the output of a broadband receiver.
If not, it's just demagoguery.
by the presence of feedback
and C-4 is a demagogue.
And you can certainly explain how the price graph is fundamentally different from the signal graph at the output of a broadband receiver.
If not, it's just demagoguery.
The price chart is the history of trades made. The second concept has more to do with electromagnetic radiation. I really don't see anything in common between the two phenomena. The analogy of price with the history of Roman civilisation has more in common, as both are history.
The price chart is a history of transactions made. The second concept has more to do with electromagnetic radiation. I really don't see anything in common between the two phenomena. The analogy of price with the history of Roman civilisation has more in common, as both are history.
I, on the other hand, disagree. DSP is a tool, it is used to analyse not only current and voltage graphs, but also seismograms, solar activity, medical anatomical data, bitstreams, and who knows what else. DSP is a powerful technology (in the right hands) precisely because an ordered series of data is necessary and sufficient for its application.
Who says that the price history does not contain the OS in any form?
I disagree. DSP is a tool, it is not just used to analyse current and voltage graphs, but also seismograms, solar activity, medical anatomical data, bitstreams, and who knows what else. DSP is a powerful technology (in the right hands) precisely because an ordered series of data is necessary and sufficient for its application.
Who says that price history does not contain OS in any form?
what is OS? Signal processing?
It is more of an observer effect from physics. There are different names in trading books, more often it is called the trader's effect
In the few years that I have been on this forum I have not been able to see any convincing results of this DSP, and this despite the fact that there are no few experts in the field.
Nor have I seen anyon the forum. And perhaps rightly so).