Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 40

 
FinBuda:
and what do you want? You just like to scribble?
I want the secret to come out). I apologise if I've spoiled your fun - you shouldn't intrigue and fool people by claiming to have invented a new bicycle with square wheels.
 
khorosh:
I want the secret to come out). Apologies if I've spoiled your fun - intriguing and fooling people by claiming to have supposedly invented a new bicycle with square wheels is not a good idea.

In fact a lot of interesting information to think about.
Also hrenfx once expressed some interesting thoughts about the use of martin. He said that it is necessary to create FI with characteristics (conditionally flat) that allow to use martin with reduced risks.
Alexander repeated several times that TS on one pair had been initially developed. And in order to reduce the drawdown, we had to create a synthetic instrument with better characteristics to use a martin (I think so).
 
sv.:

In fact, a lot of interesting information to think about.
Also hrenfx once expressed some interesting thoughts about the use of martin. He said that it is necessary to create FI with characteristics (conditionally flat) that allow to use martin with reduced risk.
Alexander reiterated that the first FS had been developed on one pair. And in order to reduce the drawdown, we had to create a synthetic instrument with better characteristics to use a martin (I think so).
Wrong. Martin has nothing to do with it. Read the back pages.
 
Aleksander:

Roma... so the words were spoken to meatu :-)

so far he's the only one who's signed up as a tanker :-)

----

i would like to hear more specific - what would you like to hear? (there is an indicator - it shows when to enter, when to exit)

Got it... :-)

Yeah. Specifically... as much as possible on your part...

The topic is interesting.

A similar one is on Five. Here.

 
sv.:

In fact, a lot of interesting information to think about.
Also hrenfx once expressed some interesting thoughts about the use of martin. He said that it is necessary to create FI with characteristics (conditionally flat) that allow to use martin with reduced risk.
Alexander reiterated that the first FS had been developed on one pair. And in order to reduce the drawdown, we had to create a synthetic instrument with better characteristics to use a martin (I think so).

This is closer, and Leanid has the most commonplace spread trading with all the consequences, and he cannot have any secrets because he has no money ))))
 

It's all understandable.
If the channel is stable, you can open from the borders and close at zero. But it's just for the time being. If the stability of the synthetic is broken, I think there is an algorithm for going to 0 or + using averaging, martin.
It all depends on the risks.
 

The first thing we did was to develop the system, which originally came to forex with a casino and already had a way of earning money on SB.

Further on there was this message from NeColla :

(By the way... xforex tyoretics ...(you read it anyway) here's your homework - develop a system of Lot Management - NOT martingale, starting lot 0.1 - Simultaneous Buy and Sell opening on EUR/USD - and achieve minimum results in the tester since early 2010, for 9 months at least $800.000,00 (eight hundred thousand) - the starting deposit of $10.000 .... Use your brain....)

And then the apotheosis of the TS was multicurrency arbitrage

The grail is found :-)
Good day gentlemen traders and traders

Grail is not a grail but the system giving a stable 100% for 4 months is found, found tested and debugged
not for sale ... just to share...

Dig in the direction of multicurrency arbitrage ... there Golden vein + moderate risk management...

======================================

the first time i came to forex with casino and already had a way to make profit from sb. but then the apotheosis of the finalization was multicurrency arbitrage .

======================================

i have here on Forime the same opinions, both about earning on SB and about multicurrency arbitrage bribes.

The links are actually alternating. Let me explain.

Let us assume that we consider forex arbitrage. For EURUSD, for example, arbitrage loops of the "first generation" = EURGBP*GBPUSD, EURJPY*JPYUSD, EURCHF*CHFUSD, etc. form really negative feedback chains. The second generation for EURUSD, it is EURGBP*GBPJPY*JPYUSD, EURJPY*JPYCHF*CHFUSD, EURAUD*AUDGBP*GBPUSD etc. They form chains of positive feedback.

The number of chains in this case increases from generation to generation. For a limited currency basket it is not difficult to calculate their number and take them as coefficients,

But in practice the basket is unlimited, though obviously not infinite, i.e. the coefficients will have to be somehow shamanized (which is not bad, let good shamans prosper). :)

Next... you have to keep thinking geniously and experiment a bit.... :))

zy. I'm sure the same principle remains valid for funds, despite the lack of such explicit arbitrage relationships in it.

zzy. Simulating a similar scheme for only three generations I obtained series of "quotations" with distinctly seen Elliott Waves. That indicates the presence of dough in the model. ;)

==============

MetaDriver 02.12.2009 01:40

begemot61 >>:
Well this is quite understandable.

There is virtually no mathematical apparatus for interpreting non-stationary processes.

All these regressions, MLE and other estimators - they all are calculated from some particular cases of stationary processes distributions

I don't think there's one that's freely available. :)) And in the proprietary - there are a lot of developments. Only... Where would I go with such a tool if I had it (let's assume I don't have it now:)?

Right, to the Forex market. Would I really get a Nobel prize?

// (staring modestly at the floor, scratching the machine with my right hand and drawing circles with the toe of my left foot...) :

- That's why I'm here........

:))

 
Is NeColla really Alexander, too?
 
Yes, he has long since admitted this - and is not hiding it.