You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Forgive me for interrupting, I think the following formula works for you
Ut =Uo EXP [-t/(R*C)
where t is time in seconds
C is the capacitance of the capacitor
Uo - voltage at the coils in the initial moment
R - resistance
Ut - voltage on the terminals at the final moment
EXP-exponent of 2.712
EXP - exponent of 2.712
I don't know what you mean by "exponent at 2,712", but I would start by saying that we need volt-ampere characteristics of our diodes :-)))
That's not to mention the fact that you seem to intend to charge a capacitor, I gather, and the kind of function you propose is somehow inconsistent...
A second resistance must also be added to this somehow.
I don't know what you mean by "exponent at 2,712", but I would start by saying that we need volt-ampere characteristics of our diodes :-)))
That's not to say that you seem to be going to charge a capacitor, I gather, and the kind of function you propose is somehow inconsistent...
diodes are not right, they have non-linearities, it's a threshold element
(or if you take a perfect rectifier then it's different)
imho it's better to charge the capacitor via a controlled switch (opens by trigger condition)
But it's a mistake with diodes because they have non-linearities.
We'll have the diodes as we set them. At least these diodes will be:
We can read it from a separate file or calculate it using a formula. If we want non-linear I-V curve - you're welcome. Our formulas do not depend on it. This is just a task parameter. Our filter will work differently with different V waveforms.
Maybe someone likes it better that way, how do I know.
But there has to be an exponent, not the point.
Or even so.
in any case, our filter should require this characteristic explicitly.