learn how to earn money villagers [Episode 2] ! - page 467

 
NNightmare:

The problem is that he has been running. The idea is not to close the limit one, but to hang a real TP, not a virtual one, and work from scratch.

I can not understand - what is the difference? To open the next min lot at an open limit position? Because when this LIMIT opens in profit will open the next min lot, when working this same limit in loss - next also opens min lot.

Why with an active Limit open the next one with min lot?

Look at this one - there is a control of opening a new bar at a traded timeframe and limitation of opening at exceeding the specified spread

extern int     SPREAD_MAX = 20; //размер спреда для стоп-торгов
Files:
 
Roman Shiredchenko:

I can't understand - what difference does it make? To open the next min lot in an OPEN limit position? After all, when this LIMIT open in profit will open the next min lot, when this same limit is triggered in loss - the next will also open min lot.

Why with an active Limit open the next one with min lot?

The reason - to reduce the risks in the flat. Let the Limit Limit one hangs and waits for its real TP. Everyone changes passwords/magic entries and continues working without hanging on the line. The only thing is to start working in the opposite direction to the hung limiters. This is, as the simplest variant, not requiring significant changes in the code. Obviously, the more knees wound, the higher the profit. But there is more graying, too))).

By the way, about the flat. Having closed, the owls open in the same direction. And the price, understandably, goes in the opposite direction. Have you thought, after closing, to open in the opposite direction?

 
NNightmare:

The point is to reduce risk in the flat. Let it hang in the limit, waiting for its real TP. The only thing is to start working in the opposite direction to the hovering limiter. The only thing is to start working in the opposite direction to the hung limiters. This is, as the simplest variant, not requiring significant changes in the code. Obviously, the more knees wound, the higher the profit. But there is more graying, too))).

By the way, about the flat. Having closed, the owls open in the same direction. And the price, understandably, goes in the opposite direction. Have you ever thought, after closing, to open in the opposite direction?





i.e. it may be that a limit position is rolled over to loss, then the price reverses and a new order of min-lot position is rolled over to loss before it reaches its own tr. As for opening to the opposite side, we should interpret the flat conditions. If we don't interpret it, we may do it without... But here in this expo the trend reversal is traded, so to speak :-) as for the next entrance opposite to the previous one, you can look here in the articles, there are expos that are generally made and optimised like this, that 1 is in the same direction, 0 is in the other one. And there variables for entry direction look like 11001100111 or something similar, but I also don't think this approach is reasonable
 
Roman Shiredchenko:
Now I get it.

Got it, but didn't get it))) Once again: a limit order gets a real TP, not a virtual one, without any SL. The SOV forgets about it, trading on. But (as a variant) opening the first order, in the opposite direction. Everything. Not increasing the profit, but reducing the amount of graying, somehow.

And with 01010110 looked, yes. Not our method, although probably someone will opt for it too))))

 
NNightmare:

Got it, but didn't get it))) Once again: a limit order gets a real TP, not a virtual one, without any SL. The SOV forgets about it, trading on. But (as a variant) opening the first order, in the opposite direction. Everything. Not increasing the profit, but reducing the amount of graying, somehow.

And with 01010110 looked, yes. Not our method, although probably someone will opt for it too))))

not a good look - 0101011 = a naked pyramid with an exhaust of 1 to 3.... where a normal marmoset would give 0 - here's a 30pts payoff at a risk of 10

 
NNightmare:

Got it, but didn't get it))) Once again: a limit order gets a real TP, not a virtual one, without any SL. The SOV forgets about it, trading on. But (as a variant) opening the first order, in the opposite direction. Everything. Not increasing the profit, but reducing the amount of graying, somehow.

And with 01010110 looked, yes. Not our method, although probably someone will opt for it too))))


Ok. And if this huge outermost limit position will go the other way from the real TP, gaining not a sour loss, then what to do?
 
Aleksander:

looked at it badly - 0101011 = a naked pyramid with an output of 1 to 3.... where a normal marmoset would give 0 - here's a 30 pips payoff at a 10 risk.


oh, what birds here... :-) will have to see...
 
Roman Shiredchenko:

Ok. And if this huge outermost limit position goes the other way from the real TP, gaining a not sour loss, then what to do?
Well, as a variant, wait it out. Trade further - only in the opposite direction, which may already require more in-depth processing of the owl. And to start with, just spin it on the tester, a toooooooooooooon hint ;-)).
 
NNightmare:
Well, as a variant, to sit it out. Trade further - only in the opposite direction, which may already require a deeper reworking of the owl. And for a start - just spin it on the tester, toooooooooon such a hint ;-)).

No, sitting is not an option here, everything is strictly according to TS. If you want to try this, you may look at the initial ones, in the branch we discussed Ilan type, i.e. rollback averaging martin, then everything was different, but they were bound to martins anyway, now it is trend reversal martin, but everything is strictly according to TS and there is no over sitting on a huge limit position, that can let you lose everything... :-)
 
Roman Shiredchenko:

No, sitting is not an option here, everything is strictly according to the rules.

I mean, you don't have to build up a huge lot. We'll try to drive with more or less reasonable size on history, maybe it will... ...it might slip through.))

If not, we'll eat cactus like that, so what?