learn how to earn money villagers [Episode 2] ! - page 467
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The problem is that he has been running. The idea is not to close the limit one, but to hang a real TP, not a virtual one, and work from scratch.
I can not understand - what is the difference? To open the next min lot at an open limit position? Because when this LIMIT opens in profit will open the next min lot, when working this same limit in loss - next also opens min lot.
Why with an active Limit open the next one with min lot?
Look at this one - there is a control of opening a new bar at a traded timeframe and limitation of opening at exceeding the specified spread
I can't understand - what difference does it make? To open the next min lot in an OPEN limit position? After all, when this LIMIT open in profit will open the next min lot, when this same limit is triggered in loss - the next will also open min lot.
Why with an active Limit open the next one with min lot?
The reason - to reduce the risks in the flat. Let the Limit Limit one hangs and waits for its real TP. Everyone changes passwords/magic entries and continues working without hanging on the line. The only thing is to start working in the opposite direction to the hung limiters. This is, as the simplest variant, not requiring significant changes in the code. Obviously, the more knees wound, the higher the profit. But there is more graying, too))).
By the way, about the flat. Having closed, the owls open in the same direction. And the price, understandably, goes in the opposite direction. Have you thought, after closing, to open in the opposite direction?
The point is to reduce risk in the flat. Let it hang in the limit, waiting for its real TP. The only thing is to start working in the opposite direction to the hovering limiter. The only thing is to start working in the opposite direction to the hung limiters. This is, as the simplest variant, not requiring significant changes in the code. Obviously, the more knees wound, the higher the profit. But there is more graying, too))).
By the way, about the flat. Having closed, the owls open in the same direction. And the price, understandably, goes in the opposite direction. Have you ever thought, after closing, to open in the opposite direction?
Got it, but didn't get it))) Once again: a limit order gets a real TP, not a virtual one, without any SL. The SOV forgets about it, trading on. But (as a variant) opening the first order, in the opposite direction. Everything. Not increasing the profit, but reducing the amount of graying, somehow.
And with 01010110 looked, yes. Not our method, although probably someone will opt for it too))))
Got it, but didn't get it))) Once again: a limit order gets a real TP, not a virtual one, without any SL. The SOV forgets about it, trading on. But (as a variant) opening the first order, in the opposite direction. Everything. Not increasing the profit, but reducing the amount of graying, somehow.
And with 01010110 looked, yes. Not our method, although probably someone will opt for it too))))
not a good look - 0101011 = a naked pyramid with an exhaust of 1 to 3.... where a normal marmoset would give 0 - here's a 30pts payoff at a risk of 10
Got it, but didn't get it))) Once again: a limit order gets a real TP, not a virtual one, without any SL. The SOV forgets about it, trading on. But (as a variant) opening the first order, in the opposite direction. Everything. Not increasing the profit, but reducing the amount of graying, somehow.
And with 01010110 looked, yes. Not our method, although probably someone will opt for it too))))
looked at it badly - 0101011 = a naked pyramid with an output of 1 to 3.... where a normal marmoset would give 0 - here's a 30 pips payoff at a 10 risk.
Well, as a variant, to sit it out. Trade further - only in the opposite direction, which may already require a deeper reworking of the owl. And for a start - just spin it on the tester, toooooooooon such a hint ;-)).
I mean, you don't have to build up a huge lot. We'll try to drive with more or less reasonable size on history, maybe it will... ...it might slip through.))
If not, we'll eat cactus like that, so what?