Recognise changes in the "behaviour" of a financial time series (Trading on the news) - page 10

 
C-4:
May faa1947 forgive me for tearing out the contest harshly, but if you look closely between the lines and drop the introductory words, you get it:
Purely my IMXO.

Exactly. But the blind do not understand the sighted.

 
Vizard:


blue - hodrick prescott
red - some model of different functions (non-drawing)
how to make a 1 in 1 nondrawing hodrick (without grids, purely by formula) ? no way... (if someone has done it, show me)... there is no information for it...
i.e. all measurements carried out on a walker are slightly incorrect.... and are carried out in a slightly different reality... especially if the walking tip is not cut off... that's why the C-4 TA works and you don't... that's the way I see it...

You - defending ignorance!!! Get lost.

PS.

TA has worked for me for many years and is working now, so what? But I'm not happy with it and I'm talking about it publicly. Although I'm not going to convince anyone of anything. Everyone works the way he wants.

PS, PS

I don't have TC on hodrick, although if you redo mine on hodrick, mine will work better. I am just thinking about econometrics and now I understand that I should use only re-drawing indicators, and not re-drawing indicators, which is exactly what I have. I have justified it on the forum. No expert in TA can justify such a thing - it is a sacred cow.

 
faa1947:

You - defending ignorance!!! Get lost.

PS.

I've had TA for years and it's working now, so what? But I'm not happy with it and I'm talking about it publicly. Although I'm not going to convince anyone of anything. Everyone works the way he wants.

PS, PS

I don't have TC on hodrick, although if you convert mine to hodrick, mine will work better. I am just thinking about econometrics and now I understand that I should use only re-drawing indicators, and not re-drawing indicators, which is exactly what I have. I have justified it on the forum. No TA expert can justify it - it's a sacred cow.


No, of course... I'm saying that we should try to change the ruler... so that it shows the correct behaviour of the row and at the same time is not too fantastic...

not on a hodrick but on a non-drawing hodrick...and it's not about the TA...I mean the ruler actually...

 
faa1947:

Just from an econometric point of view, I now understand that only redrawing indicators should be used, and that non-drawing indicators should not be used... I have justified this on the forum. No expert in TA can justify it - it is a sacred cow.

Yes, yes. Also we must add redrawing orders to redrawing indicators and it will be a total econometric idyll.
 
Decided I would ignore the news, read a lot of stuff, decided that at the level of private traders and small investment funds it was all up to my ears.
 
C-4:
Yes, yes, yes. We should also add to the redrawing indicators the redrawing orders and then it will be a complete econometric idyll.
You're laughing for nothing. Rewriting indicators are not the same as overcrossing ones, just as not every human being is human.