![MQL5 - Language of trade strategies built-in the MetaTrader 5 client terminal](https://c.mql5.com/i/registerlandings/logo-2.png)
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No, only for time (TF). You always need a Mashup of the trading horizon, and it always has to correspond to some cycle (session, day, week, month). Everything :)
I read about horizon in the light of optimum average, but cycle why does it owe to anyone?
In Livermore's time, Saturday was a trading day, so the optimal MA was =24*6?
About the horizon in light of the optimum average, and the cycle why does it owe anyone?
It also depends on how you look at it. You can say it's only flat, or you can say it's only trending.
Lizanka, the head moderator will come along now and take down your chart, which is without a "basement".
Why are you picking on this sine wave, the question is in the thread title.
And that's my cow. Get your own and milk it elsewhere.
DmitriyN 05/18/2012 22:15
sand:
It depends on how you look at it too. You may say that there is only flat, or you may say that there are only trends.
It's also true. One should look through the prism of profit.
About the horizon in light of the optimum average, and the cycle why does it owe anyone?
Because it makes no sense to look for process patterns at intervals whose duration is not comparable to the period of the process. Somewhere like this ...
What are you picking on this sine wave, the question is in the thread title.
And that's my cow. Get your own and milk it somewhere else.
Science lesson. The teacher asks:
- Mashenka, where does milk come from?
- A cow gives it!
- Well done, Mashenka!
- Vovochka, does an ox give milk?
- No, Mary Ivanovna, the bull gives yoghurt!
No, I'm not going to ask how to trade on a sine wave again.
_ it is meaningless to look for process patterns at intervals whose duration is not comparable to the period of the process _
That's a very good point. I agree.
Yes, Kotelnikov made a good point:)