You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This is the real market without DC filters. Whoever is closest to the source succeeds. Short pings are important. It should be. You are just not used to it yet.
Are there any results in the real world?
The joke comes to mind. A scientist in a research laboratory demonstrates the results of his work on a miracle baldness ointment. He puts it on a ping-pong ball and the ball gets all fluffy. To the question: will this ointment help on a bare skull? The answer is: "Unfortunately, we are planning to get it only in the distant future.)
Let him jump - quickly and no problems, if he does not value his life, but if, for example, if he threatened to cut off at least his leg, I would be the first to raise the question: what are we going to do now? First his leg - find money for a prosthesis, then his arm - find money for a prosthesis, and then his head? .... )))
IHMO. The grail exists...
Grail=hold the spread
Either you're out of here or you're in here.
Tester - a great fun for creating grails! )))
A tester is great fun for making grails! )))
I absolutely and completely agree with you. I just do not physically understand how you can get 500% a month. I can agree with everything - even the fact that tick analysis is "ze best". But for me to agree with 500% a month - show me a real one. Not a demo. Demo and tester - no way. Any percentage is possible on the demo and in the tester. If you show me this trick on the real, at least for six months, then it's a topic for discussion. ))))
In principle, I have seen and 13000% per month on the real - but once, for 1 month. Further, this man (trader) could not repeat this "miracle" on the real)))) Moreover, even 100% a month could not be achieved. Consider that 13000% a month on real account - it is pure luck - a one-time "miracle" )))).
Therefore, the 500%/month statement and emphasis on market liquidity is pure tester bravado )))) Or confirm with the real ))))
In this regard, the claim of 500% a month and the hint of market liquidity is pure tester bravado )))) Or confirm with real ))))
And if it is reproduced on different instruments and timeframes?
// If I had such a system, I wouldn't post my statements on the forum... :)
The key word here is "if" ))) Show the semi-annual real and it's done ))))