[ARCHIVE!] Any rookie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't pass by. Can't go anywhere without you - 4. - page 322
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Please advise, I am not very good at programming, I need to merge two EAs SekundenTrader(opening orders from chart) and lvoe 1.6.1(dragging levels of orders with mouse) in first EA go throughint, in second EA through void (int start(), int init() vs. void start()void init(), etc.).) . None of the codes accepts another specifier, i.e. lvoe 1.6.1does not accept int , while SekundenTrader accepts void. Is it possible to make these EAs together or one of them will need another implementation, maybe a look at the code will help professionals to make a verdict.
/*decompiled EA removed*/
Please advise, I am not very good at programming, I need to merge two EAs SekundenTrader(opening orders from chart) and lvoe 1.6.1(dragging levels of orders with mouse) in first one the calculation is done throughint, in second one through void (int start(), int init() vs. void start()void init(), etc.)) . None of the codes accepts another specifier, i.e. lvoe 1.6.1does not accept int , while SekundenTrader accepts void. Is it possible to make these EAs together or one of them will need another implementation, maybe a look at the code will help professionals to make a verdict.
/*decompiled EA removed*/
If you change void to int, at the end of the EA's start it should be return(0), while if you change int to void, on the contrary, remove it from there. Although, in the second case the return can be left in place. But in principle, it has no place there with void function type.
If you change void to int, you should put return(0) at the end of the EA's start, and if you change int to void, on the contrary, remove it from there. Although, in the second case, return can be left in place. But in principle, it has no place there with void function type.
Thanks, as soon as the bidding goes I will try to fiddle with it, although I seem to have done so - I sewed lvoe into sekunden. So seckundena functions worked, but lvoe does not. I'll try again. Terminal has OnClickTrading with all these gimmicks, so it closes too much workspace and it's not convenient.
Isn't it easier to make your own EA using your own trading system than to search through thousands of other EAs looking for a grail?
Isn't it easier to make your own Expert Advisor using your own trading system rather than going through thousands of other EAs looking for a grail?
Can you please tell me what the problem is? Updating login and password doesn't help:
2012.08.13 02:24:09 '797053': previous successful authorization performed from 109.68.236.12
Can you please tell me what the problem is? Updating login and password doesn't help:
2012.08.13 02:24:09 '797053': previous successful authorization performed from 109.68.236.12
That's just information - the previous successful authorization performed from 109.68.....