Spectrum derivative (or spectrum acceleration) - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Anyone has looked into this question - dynamic coefficients in an integral. if you can just put it in simple words, like here https://www.mql5.com/go?link=https://theoryandpractice.ru/posts/842-chto-takoe-integral-i-zachem-mne-znat-eto.
It is interesting to look at it from this point of view. In essence, we have the same sampling reduction process as in the cited link about the integral. only the limit is still minutes, but it is possible to go into ticks.
(It's almost a new word.) Go ahead and argue with zhunko (he says dc filters help) or Prival), while subluk would shoot you for such an attitude to ticks))) profitability and sense in deepening into tick analysis is evident to me.
Prival, if I'm not mistaken, has long understood the viciousness of mt ticks and switched to the real US futures market. At least I've seen it in the hangout there.
The profitability of ticks is obvious to me. but if you have not noticed, the topic is not about that when i get to the ticks and we'll discuss it there.
Tick is the same bar - an awesome discovery. Practically a new word.
Oh, man, we're discussing derivatives-spectrums here, huh...
Prival, if I'm not mistaken, has long ago realized the viciousness of mt ticks and moved to the real American futures market. At least I've seen him in the hangout there.
Tick is the same bar - an awesome discovery. Practically a new word.
Oh, man, we're discussing derivatives-spectrums here, huh....
I'm not the one who started the ticks topic. And Prival has studied everything, he must have come a long way, but he has also worked here, he needs to move to a serious platform, but that's the next stage.
It's all a load of bollocks.)
What do you even want to see?
What do you even want to see?
This is what I want to see https://forum.mql4.com/ru/20676/page2, but I must be doing it through the back door
That's what I want to do https://forum.mql4.com/ru/20676/page2, but I must be doing it through the back door.
Then why are there several drawings? If you want to see movement earlier on one pair than on others, then make a min period of 2 and max 20 for example
Then why are there several drawings? If you want to see the nucleation of the movement earlier on one pair than on others, then make a min period 2 and max 20 for example.
I did not apply this to one data series, but to similar synthetics of series c, as the period increases the synthetics change so decompositions like yours were needed for each series separately and for each period separately.
Speaking of ticks, even in this formulation of the integral with different numbers of ticks per minute, the a and b segment will be different for different pairs.
Speaking of ticks, even in this formulation of the integral with different numbers of ticks per minute, the a and b segment will be different for different pairs.
First you have to make sure that there can be such an integral at all, at ticks.
Why not?