[Archive] Learn how to make money villagers! - page 162

New comment
 
There is no such thing as unformalizable logic - ask a specialist if you can't code it yourself, the main thing is the algorithm (if it exists and really works), it's no problem to code it.
 
OnGoing:


I've already written about it, that the loca destroying will be an intelligent system, which is different for each of us. For example, I still can't pass the curtstraydown parameter to the EA. That's where the EA is at the moment.....
 
4x-online:
So this is the essence of your "system" - the illusory accumulation of risks and locks in a 50-50 situation minus the costs of trading. And if you move away from that crap and look for the advantage of entries and exits, then why do you need locks and averages? Deadlock.

You have to think carefully about the averaging and then you should test it first, after you wait for the owl and then you'll get a better idea of the depth of the deal.
 
4x-online:
So this is the essence of your "system" - an illusory accumulation of risks and locks in a 50-50 minus trading costs situation. And if you want to avoid this shit and seek the advantage of incoming and outgoing, then what for do you need locks and averaging? Dead end.

Perhaps, we could still introduce a filter to start trading, as I said above. And in order not to decrease the number of deals, to look for entries on all pairs simultaneously (but be in the market on only one instrument).

In this case, the probability of application of the hated position is reduced to a theoretically possible minimum.

 
4x-online:
So this is the essence of your "system" - the illusory accumulation of risks and locks in a 50-50 situation minus the costs of trading. And if you move away from that shit and look for the advantage of entry-exits, then why do you need locks and averaging? Deadlock.

But critique is a criticism, but Ilan may work without any locks - the testing period from 25.11.2009 till 25.11.2011.


 
Doesn't work, -$100 real
 
LeMaxx:
Doesn't work, -$100 real
Is that Ilan?
 
OnGoing:

Perhaps, we could still introduce a filter to start trading, as I said above. And in order not to decrease the number of deals, to look for entries on all pairs simultaneously (but be in the market only on one instrument).

In this case, the probability of application of the hated loc is reduced to a theoretically possible minimum.

At the distance the filter will work 50-50. But for each opening-closing you will pay a penny to the broker. Trading is a game with an inherently negative expectation. And no one has invented a better method than to have a proven at least 3-5 years advantage, which will be at least 60-40 in your favour. And here the options are already possible. The theoretically best one is to exit right away, if the forecast is wrong, or to increase a position, if you entered correctly and have profit. But note that there is no smell of lots and averages here.
 
TEXX:

It works :)))

your code exactly no, but the report is from the original
 
4x-online:
At the distance, the filter will work 50-50. But for every open-close you will pay a penny to the broker. Trading is a game with an inherently negative expectation. And no one has invented a better method than to have a proven at least 3-5 years advantage, which will be at least 60-40 in your favour. And here the options are already possible. The theoretically best one is to exit right away, if the forecast is wrong, or to increase a position, if you entered correctly and have profit. But note that there is nothing to do with losing lots and averaging.
Not really. The transaction costs plus floating spreads, slippages, requotes, swaps are a mosquito's buzz in this case).
1...155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169...882
New comment