You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Reminds me of a thread with feet (same author...)
Reminds me of a branch with stops (same author...)
With stops good, without stops bad...
correction: without stops fast ....
Stop on entry point (IgorM) (C)
cp, for the reminder, I don't think I showed the results then - with this SL setting system, it is safe to pipsize in the evening - I checked by hand, out of 54 trades, only one loss of - 30 pips, about 15 in profit from 10 to 35 pips, and the remaining 0 pips
What were you looking for, if not a mystery? Did you just analyse the statistics?
I have, so to say - active recreation in the form of programming, which alternates with periods of manual trading (to understand how the market works), which is then replaced by TA (continuing development of TS with "take profit prediction"), which then alternates with searching for the optimal ratio of Money Management and risk managment.
Specifically to your question - tested whether it is real to make $100 out of $10 with a leverage of 1:500, I checked - it is real, but you need to take care of nerves, very addictive to the excitement: unrealistic look at the state in which there is no losing trades :) I also checked the theory that I can trade without indicators - it's possible, and I would not say it's difficult.
I have, so to say - active recreation in the form of programming, which alternates with periods of manual trading (to understand how the market works), which is then replaced by TA (continuing development of TS with "take profit prediction"), which then alternates with searching for the optimal ratio of Money Management and risk managment.
Specifically to your question - tested whether it is real to make $100 out of $10 with a leverage of 1:500, I checked - it is real, but you need to take care of nerves, very addictive to the excitement: unrealistically hard to look at the state in which there is no losing trades :) I also checked the theory that you can trade without indicators - you can, and I would not say that it's difficult
"The honchos are clashing" (c).
The topicstarter has made the mistake of allowing himself to be dragged into a terminological debate. I suggest we virtually change the title of the thread to "What I understand by TA" and focus on what the author has to say on the merits, without clinging to words.
The man trades, and trades successfully, so it is useful to learn from his experience.
No, Vitya! I will be principled!
I didn't make a mistake - I deliberately caused this stream of infantile consciousness.
There is nothing but now.
You're not getting a sequel. Sort out the beginning.
===
Figured it out for myself. There's no interest here. The irreparable conflict of the right hemisphere with the rest of the brain is the gap between our civilizations.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/9659