TA or something you don't know about. - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It is positive at the time of your test or negative. But all in your power ...
in every thread like this, it's the same thing...
everyone has had such a successful experience, but for some reason the vast majority of them flush
That's not what we're talking about, the definition of TA
How are TA and VA so fundamentally different? Nothing, both are analyses and both do not predict. But the concept of a trend is familiar to everyone here. Oh yeah, sorry, it's just TA.
I thought BA was a graphical method of TA.
The most adequate analysis is always WITHOUT purpose. Therefore it can be adequate because it is unbiased.
...
Yeah - meditation - for the sake of - meditation, masturbation - for the sake of - masturbation... :-)))
NONSENSE... Either give it together already - your definition of TA.
How are TA and VA so fundamentally different? Nothing, both are analyses and both are not predictive. But the concept of a trend is familiar to everyone here. Oh yes, sorry, it's just TA.
You're talking about experience that comes with time. And it does come with time.
I'm saying that you can't get a strategy without TA, and without a strategy there's no hope of profits, forget it, will anyone speak on the subject?
))) Are you not confusing Orientation with Forecasting?
Or.
What is, with what is to come?
The problem with players is mainly that they predict rather than play by context.
Even simpler: they pass off glitches as reality.
The TA is our target with the TA and putting the TA will be our prediction and the stop loss will cancel the prediction (either it is wrong or a stop on the TA)
The subject of measurement is different. If you can't see the difference then of course g...
measuring? And I thought that in both cases the price is the subject of measurement.
Yeah - meditation - for - meditation's sake, masturbation - for - masturbation's sake... :-)))
NONSENSE... Either give it together - your definition of TA.
The subject of measurement is different. If you can't see the difference then of course g...