The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 502
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I agree. But, I am interested in the outcome of this experiment. I'm willing to do a similar thing with any row - whether it's for one or more instruments.
No one is in a position to fight a PPP - that I can say with confidence.
One pair can easily be tested in a tester with an expert.
I agree, that's why I'm doing a pan or propane experiment.
I agree, that's why I'm doing a pan or propane experiment.
It looks good on the spreadsheet.
but having a few pairs spoils everything,
It won't work on a few pairs, take my word for it.
several pairs - this is margin, the cost of tick, the contract volume, different prices, the mutual influence of your new volumes at different pairs (the tester cannot simulate this) and so on and so forth
it's not as simple as it may seem at first sight
Taki no, not infinitely large. The numerator subtracts the risk-free rate. Technically we get 0/0. You've got to be a lapidary, though.
You're right. For some reason I thought MT counts without this subtraction, but the manual says that the risk free rate is taken into account. It would be interesting to look at the specific sharpe formula used in MT.
If you introduce a parameter for the probability of bankruptcy of a savings bank P, then the sharpe will be -sqrt(P/(1-P)) and its value (the feature in zero disappears) at P=0 will be 0 )
It looks good on the excel.
but having multiple pairs spoils everything,
it won't work on several pairs, take my word for it
several pairs - it's a margin, the cost of tick, the volume of the contract, different prices, mutual influence, etc., etc.
it's not as easy as it looks.
Your indyuk, if smoothed out, seems to be pretty good too.
Your turkey, if smoothed out, seems pretty good too.
I used to make money on it and, as it turned out after a few years, I wasn't the only one.
as i remember i was buying on one line and selling on the other.
the second option seems to be the difference.
can't remember for sure.
I was making money on it and as it turned out a few years later I wasn't the only one
as i remember i was driving on one line to buy, the other to sell
the second option is kind of like the difference.
I don't remember exactly.
If you have a smoother one you can see the trend (which line is higher or lower) and determine the signal by the candlestick.
In the smoothed one you can see the trend (which line is higher or lower) and determine the signal by the candlestick.
ack was complaining that they don't put it out
Let him use it.
because I usually only post this after I've come up with a much cooler one
and again with a note:
for trading on one pair!!!
If a second pair or more comes up, it's a fiasco.
You are right. For some reason I thought MT counted without this subtraction, but the manual says that the risk free rate is taken into account. It would be interesting to look at the specific sharpe formula used in MT.
If you introduce a parameter for the probability of bankruptcy of a savings bank P, then the sharpe will be -sqrt(P/(1-P)) and its value (the feature in zero disappears) at P=0 will be 0 )
I wonder then where in MT options can this very risk free rate be set? maybe I don't know something...
To end the SB, cite any price range and I will show that, there is no SB, but a clear pattern.
And here you go:
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/crude-oil-prices