The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 499
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Here's a simple example.
I've got it all figured out for you. You're an intuitive mathematician.
If you flip a coin, it's 50/50. That's why intuitively, it seems to be a predominant flat on the SB. Well, it has to be, because it's 50/50. That's where you'll make your biggest mistake. There's no flat on the SB. Isn't that unusual? Doesn't make sense, does it? But it's a common mathematical result. A lot has been written about it. Read about it.
I've got you all figured out. You're an intuitive mathematician.
If you flip a coin, it's 50/50 tails. That's why it intuitively seems to be a flat. Well, it has to be, because it's 50/50. That's where you make your biggest mistake. There's no flat on the SB. Isn't that unusual? Doesn't make sense, does it? But it's a common mathematical result. A lot has been written about it. Read about it.
I'll be blunt about his approach.
I take any signal indicator and apply a RMS to it.
for forex, it is generally accepted that the most pleasant result in terms of profit is obtained using the golden ratio and it is approximately +/- 2*SCO/3
however such a strategy is waiting and low-risk and therefore almost unprofitable
Not bad, but I don't like them.
It's not easy, but it's hard to read.
Well done!!!
You were right to delete it!!!
Now people will spend all day wondering what was written here.
I've got you all figured out. You're an intuitive mathematician.
If you flip a coin, it's 50/50 tails. That's why it intuitively seems to be a flat. Well, it has to be, because it's 50/50. That's where you make your biggest mistake. There's no flat on the SB. Isn't that unusual? Doesn't make sense, does it? But it's a common mathematical result. A lot has been written about it. Read about it.
NLP in action.
Renat is pitted against Genghis.
Allies are made adversaries.
Classic.
I'll be blunt about his approach
You take any signal indicator and apply a RMS to it
for forex it is accepted to believe that the most pleasant result in terms of profit is obtained in the golden ratio, and it is approximately +/- 2*SCO/3
however such a strategy is waiting and low-risk and therefore almost unprofitable
not bad, but I don't like them.
Show someone my comment he will explain to you what you don't understand. I'm just right even stumped, because you can't explain it any easier. You don't understand, that's too bad...
You are an amazing person. I'm even embarrassed to be convinced that you are deeply wrong. There's a kind of reverent naivety to your narrative.
I realized that I couldn't advise you to read Shiryaev. That would be inhumane of me.
I'm trying to retell the primer here in simple understood words. Read my posts at From Theory to Practice 2.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/366487/page68#comment_21941703
Rena... What are you doing with the turkeys?)
Come on!
So-and-so
this formula in my indicator has recently been published by an experienced in the branch of predictions (the original is _new-rena.mq4, but it is lost)
i put this indicator in my branch once in 2013 and i erased it a couple hours later
and a friend downloaded it
and this indicator came back recently with the comment - grail
but when was that???
you just don't know how much water has flowed since then ...
well i also downloaded my own indicator ;))))
You are an amazing person. I even felt uncomfortable convincing you that you were deeply wrong. There is a kind of reverent naivety in your narrative.
I realized I couldn't recommend you to read Shiryaev. That would be inhumane of me.
I'm trying to retell the primer here in simple understood words. Read my posts at From Theory to Practice 2.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/366487/page68#comment_21941703
I'm trying to retell the primer here in simple understandable words. Read my posts at From Theory to Practice 2.