When does it make sense to keep part of the robot code in an indicator? - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So you are saying that the same code in the indicator will run faster than in the Expert Advisor, even without regard to circulation time?
I didn't claim that.
I didn't say that.
But that's what you want to prove with this experiment - otherwise why put the code into the indicator?
Integer:
Andrei01:
So you are saying that the same code in the indicator will run faster than in the Expert Advisor, even without regard to circulation time?
I didn't claim that.
By the way. The EMA is also quite easy to transfer to an EA without any loss of speed. When it comes to more complex calculations
But that's what you want to prove with this experiment - otherwise why should you put the code into an indicator?
Not that. Why so many words? Is it too weak to write an expert calculating the EMA in yourself right now? What is the problem? What is the difficulty?
By the way. The EMA is also quite easy to transfer to an EA without any loss of speed. But when it comes to more complex calculations
For a tester - yes. For a real EA - no.
Not that. Why so many words? Is it too weak to write an expert calculating the EMA in yourself right now? What is the problem? What is the difficulty?
Why?
To stop fantasising and feel reality.
Why?