[Archive! - page 20
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Svinozavr, quit smoking thermonuclear. :(((
http://topwar.ru/3798-lozh-pro-liviyu-gnil-oficioznyx-smi-vosstaniya-ne-bylo-svidetelstva-rossiyan-ochevidcev.html
NUMBERS AND FACTS OF SOCIALIST LIBYAN JAMAHIRIA:
GDP per capita - $14,192.
For each family member, the state pays $1,000 a year in subsidies.
Unemployment benefits - $730.
Nursing salaries - $1,000.
For every new-born baby $7 000.
Newlyweds are given $64 000 to buy a flat.
For starting a personal business one-time financial assistance - $20 000.
Large taxes and fees are prohibited.
Education and medicine are free.
Education and training abroad - at the expense of the state.
A network of shops for large families with symbolic prices for basic foodstuffs.
Large fines and detention by special police units for selling expired products.
Part of pharmacies - with free issue of medicines.
Death penalty for counterfeit medicines.
No rent - no.
No electricity charges for population.
Sale and use of alcohol is prohibited - "dry law".
Cre 1 litre of petrol - $0.14.
I'm afraid to invite reproach from those present.
But I don't like the situation when a greedy bunch of "European outsiders" start bombing populated areas in Libya without much regard for whether the airstrikes are on civilian or military targets. Turning the entire Arab world against Europe.
I think Libyans would have sorted it out among themselves. Especially since it is unlikely that the so-called "rebels" are much better than Gaddafi. I think it's just the opposite! Somebody really wanted to take over the helm instead of Gaddafi. No more than that.
Note that in general absolutely nothing is known about who those rebels are.
+100500
When some dictator in some poor African country massacred some part of the population along ethnic lines the UN turned a blind eye and silently withdrew its peacekeeping forces and left the doomed people to die. All because there was no oil there. Hypocritical bastards. Iraq, Libya, who's next?
Deadly stunt on an aircraft carrier.
http://www.topgearrussia.ru/videos/101731/e0091d65.html
I'm afraid to invite reproach from those present.
But I don't like the situation when a greedy bunch of "European outsiders" start bombing populated areas in Libya without much regard for whether the airstrikes are on civilian or military targets. Turning the entire Arab world against Europe.
I think Libyans would have sorted it out among themselves. Especially since it is unlikely that the so-called "rebels" are much better than Gaddafi. I think it's just the opposite! Somebody really wanted to take over the helm instead of Gaddafi. No more than that.
Note that in general absolutely nothing is known about who those rebels are.
Don't talk nonsense, live in a country where the government has not changed for years, you do not have to go far, there is an oil country next door, what will you do if something happens on April 3, and we are very close, in 1986 riots were unafraid even of the Soviet government, now they will put you on a pitchfork, patience is running out, in a country that has everything with a population of Moscow, most people live in poverty!!!
And look at what's happening now, young people are growing up, and they will go out on April 3, everyone is apathetic towards the government everywhere, many are already saying they're fed up. If girls are not afraid, I am not even talking about the guys, our mentality is that they tolerate for a long time but then they can really kick their asses. Many things are just not shown, riots have broken out in places, but one day they will all come together.
Six girls vs.
I hope nothing happens, but it feels like we are sitting on a powder keg. And why did they have to hold these referendums? They would have kept quiet until 2012 but they stirred people up and the negative reaction spread all over the country.
Don't talk nonsense, live in a country where the government has not changed for years, you do not have to go far, there is an oil country next door, what will you do if something happens on April 3, and we are very close, .....
What does 1986 have to do with it? You seem to pretend you don't understand what I was writing about.
I wrote about the "greedy pack of jackals" who fire rockets into Libyan population centres.
Let the Libyans come out and protest and fight against Gaddafi, for God's sake. But it is not Gaddafi, - it is "rebels" who have plunged the country into a bloody mess at the moment. So let them sort it out among themselves.
Without the "missile help" of the USA, France, England and yapping Norway. You would think those who conduct air strikes would care about the fate of the Libyan people. Don't make people laugh.
And about the "poverty" of Libyans - see the post from Granit-77, three posts above.
What does 1986 have to do with it? You seem to pretend you don't understand what I was writing about.
I wrote about the "greedy pack of jackals" who fire rockets into Libya's population centres.
Let the Libyans come out and protest and fight against Gaddafi, for God's sake. But it is not Gaddafi, - it is "rebels" who have plunged the country into a bloody mess at the moment. So let them sort it out among themselves.
Without the "missile help" of the USA, France, England and yapping Norway. You would think those who conduct air strikes would care about the fate of the Libyan people. Don't make people laugh.
And about the "poverty" of the Libyans - see the post from Granit-77, three posts above.
I meant what you said about the postanimals: Especially since it's unlikely that the so-called "rebels" are much better than Gaddafi. I think it's just the opposite! Somebody really wanted to run the place of Gaddafi. No more than that.
I understand them, for example, people will not take to the streets just like that, and it is unlikely that someone wanted to rule.
About the coalition I agree.