EURUSD - Trends, Forecasts and Implications (Part 3) - page 401

 
ZetM:

They know best, they're pros... ))))

They must have settled in solidly))))
 
strangerr:

I guess they've settled in solidly))))

Probably...)))
 
Fartowiy:
1SSRO is showing a correction on the daily, which is a serious signal.

Show me a screenshot.
 

"You're not the only one who doesn't understand anything!!! The market trades in a strange way..... sat for half a day, went to sleep for three hours, came back - everything is as it was..... no pullbacks, no trending, no correction........"

 
strangerr:

"You're not the only one who doesn't understand anything!!! The market trades in a strange way..... sat for half a day, went to sleep for three hours, came back - everything is as it was..... no pullbacks, no trending, no correction........"

I wonder what TF are we talking about?
 
Temnyj:
I wonder what TF are we talking about?

)))

He didn't say anything about that))) Ask on MT5. Euro has been 25 ppts since the opening))))

 
strangerr:

)))

He didn't say anything about that))) Ask on MT5. Euro as much as 25 ppts have passed since opening)))

"You're not the only one who doesn't understand anything!!! The market is trading in a strange way..... sat for half a day, went to sleep for three hours, came back - everything is as it was..... no pullbacks, no trending, no correction........"
 

need to go down a bit, otherwise it could be a long wobble here)))))))

 
America's coming, kicking in somewhere.
 
strangerr:

"You're not the only onewho doesn't understand anything!!!The market trades in a strange way..... sat for half a day, went to sleep for three hours, came back - everything is the same as it was..... no pullbacks, no trending, no correction........"


Totally agree with you. Which is annoying. If small TF up to H4 are sane, you can read, but older TF, few people know how to read, and are there any of them? Booooo big question....))))

As an option, development situations. Exhibited at the wolves on Dmitry Vasilyevich's website. Said "justify" the look. Failed to justify....)))) Got "arsed", but I think it may well be realistic. I.e. the zig-zag has been formed, but the "C" wave turns out truncated, but it is acceptable. Now we can consider the movement as forming of the first leg of the second zig-zag. This variant is cancelled at breakdown of 1.5149 (key level).

What do you think?