create an expert for mt4 using a programme made in exel - page 21
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Gentlemen, the situation in question was not one-sided. THERE WAS NO +3 OR -3. Why are you making a fuss here that I don't understand!?
2 forecasts and the next 1000 ticks
Apologies for the possibly useless charts, but hopefully this will shield you from even more useless bars of numbers
combine all 2000 points into one graph and I will overlay it with the 1000 point forecast I sent you and for now without jumping to conclusions, please
because the price has gone down)
No, that's what I said before, browse the forum
Yusuf, you said that:
If indicator directions give +, then the predicted values are the values of the highest indicator.
If the directions of the indicators give -, then the predicted values are the values of the lowest indicator.
Indicators give plus. In the table, the uppermost indicator is P3 (purple). Why are you now saying that you should use P2?
I've said it before, the P2 line always matches the interests of the two indicators isn't it hard to look at the chart?
It's strange that the creator of an Exel program can't draw the graphics in Exel...
A clever marketing ploy: "If you put effort into it, you won't throw it away!
:)
OK. Are we going to post ticks until we get a signal to input? Can I know approximately how many times the file will have to be emptied?
it was wrong, I started the analysis wrongly, if you remember, with the first points, and after 20 minutes the robot entered the market, stayed there for 40 minutes and came out with a nice profit (see my relevant messages), so this time it did the right thing, without entering the market - not the entire market is ours, but only certain parts of it)
You only sent me a picture, it is archived here on the forum. I cannot do anything with it.
Even if you send me the figures themselves from that picture, people might say that it is already a fitting.
The graph is already on the forum and you are not fooling anyone
The schedule is already on the forum and you are not fooling anyone.
Unfortunately, I feel that I am arguing with specialists predisposed to a negative result, and this is very sad, criticism should be constructive, especially I do not strive for someone to like the reasoning