You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So what.
Show us a better result with OOS 9 years - there will be something to talk about, but in the meantime stop trying to sound like a "great professional" - you don't even have that kind of result.
Come on, knock it off already. For all the time you've been brainwashing people on this forum, don't you see that no one is going to buy your EA?
Come on, stop it already. For so long you have been brainwashing people on this forum, is it really clear that no one is going to buy your Expert Advisor?
I'm not selling it - it is lying in its source code base, it is not hungry :)
Cut the flubbing already. If you can't do any better, get some rest.
Come on, knock it off already. For all the time you've been brainwashing people on this forum, don't you see that no one is going to buy your EA?
The purpose of this thread - to keep activity and interest in the EA as long as possible (if you openly say on this forum about the sale, the thread will be taken down). This expo is sold through different methods, by searching for investors on the account etc.
This forum is only used for advertising purposes. This is the usual hidden advertising, although he doesn't say it openly, but it is.
Every post or comment in this thread lifts the thread to the top of the forum again and fouls up the forum itself with it.
It's not worth getting involved in.
If you want to end its existence then just ignore it and don't post anything here. I think the topicstarter has had more than a month of "quiet time to himself".
I'm not selling it - it's lying in the source code base, it's not asking to be eaten :)
Can't you show me
What is your website selling then? Or is it for those who can't compile themselves? Or is it like this: "the one in the base is the free version, test from it. Paid one sells better, but how - I'll show you only for money".
Who are you for me to "show you"? You've posted your test for comments, which you've got and you've been explicitly told that the Expert Advisor that trades that way, be it on a forward or anywhere else, is a total failure. Get over it and write a new one.Prove that "total fiasco". Mathematically rigorous.
Can't prove mathematically rigorously - prove by example that there are better algorithms - lay out a similar test with the source, so there is no cheating.
Can't prove mathematically rigorously or by example - just keep quiet - you've got the wrong branch.
Prove the 'total fiasco'. Mathematically rigorous.
And you run it not for 9, but since the end of the first profitable series (i.e. 8 years) - judging by your own graph, you get a mathematically rigorous margin call: you have a drawdown of 18,000. So Epic fail.
EURUSD symbol (Euro vs US Dollar)
Period 1 Minute (M1) 2002.01.01 07:53 - 2010.12.31 18:59 (2002.01.01 - 2011.01.01)
Model All ticks (the most accurate method based on the smallest available timeframes)
Parameters StopBase=0.012; marketOrderOn=false; spred=0.0005; slippage=200; absAmount=1; timeframe=240; currentIdOrder="1";
Bars in history 3079325 Modelled ticks 40276638 Modelling quality 25.00%
Chart mismatch errors 0
Initial deposit 10000.00
Net profit 43890.60 Total profit 381596.20 Total loss -337705.60
Profitability 1.13 Expected payoff 72.43
Absolute drawdown 2049.00 Maximum drawdown 18722.60 (59.15%) Relative drawdown 59.15% (18722.60)
Total trades 606 Short positions (% win) 293 (51.54%) Long positions (% win) 313 (54.31%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 321 (52.97%) Loss trades (% of all) 285 (47.03%)
Largest profitable trade 1214.00 (loss trade -1254.00)
Average profitable trade 1188.77 losing trade -1184.93
Maximum number of uninterrupted wins (profit) 11 (13179.40) uninterrupted losses (loss) 9 (-10704.00)
Maximum continuous profits (number of wins) 13179.40 (11) continuous losses (number of losses) -10704.00 (9)
Average continuous gain 2 continuous loss 2
As komposter correctly pointed out: "Judging by these figures, to get about 4.5K a year ($46340 / 10 years) you need to have a deposit of at least 18.5K".
And I agree with him - a deposit needs to be made with an appropriate margin of safety. You do not have to keep it all in BC - in case of drawdown it is enough to fill it up temporarily.
EURUSD symbol (Euro vs US Dollar)
Period 1 Minute (M1) 2003.01.01 05:59 - 2010.12.31 18:59 (2003.01.01 - 2011.01.01)
Model All ticks (the most accurate method based on the smallest available timeframes)
Parameters StopBase=0.012; marketOrderOn=false; spred=0.0005; slippage=200; absAmount=1; timeframe=240; currentIdOrder="1";
Bars in history 2715624 Modelled ticks 38055168 Modelling quality 25.00%
Chart mismatch errors 0
Initial deposit 20000.00
Net profit 27396.60 Total profit 353279.00 Total loss -325882.40
Profitability 1.08 Expected payoff 47.90
Absolute drawdown 13310.60 Maximum drawdown 18718.60 (73.67%) Relative drawdown 73.67% (18718.60)
Total trades 572 Short positions (% win) 283 (51.59%) Long positions (% win) 289 (52.25%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 297 (51.92%) Loss trades (% of all) 275 (48.08%)
Most profitable trade 1211.00 Loss trade -1253.00
Average profitable trade 1189.49 losing trade -1185.03
Maximum number of uninterrupted wins (profit) 11 (13183.40) uninterrupted losses (loss) 9 (-10702.00)
Maximum continuous profits (number of wins) 13183.40 (11) continuous losses (number of losses) -10702.00 (9)
Average continuous gain 2 continuous loss 2
Period 1 Minute (M1) 2003.01.01 05:59 - 2010.12.31 18:59 (2003.01.01 - 2011.01.01)
Model All ticks (the most accurate method based on the smallest available timeframes)
Parameters StopBase=0.012; marketOrderOn=false; spred=0.0005; slippage=200; absAmount=1; timeframe=240; currentIdOrder="1";
Bars in history 2715624 Modelled ticks 38055168 Modelling quality 25.00%
Chart mismatch errors 0
Initial deposit 20000.00
Net profit 27396.60 Total profit 353279.00 Total loss -325882.40
Profitability 1.08 Expected payoff 47.90
Absolute drawdown 13310.60 Maximum drawdown 18718.60 (73.67%) Relative drawdown 73.67% (18718.60)
Total trades 572 Short positions (% win) 283 (51.59%) Long positions (% win) 289 (52.25%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 297 (51.92%) Loss trades (% of all) 275 (48.08%)
Most profitable trade 1211.00 Loss trade -1253.00
Average profitable trade 1189.49 losing trade -1185.03
Maximum number of uninterrupted wins (profit) 11 (13183.40) uninterrupted losses (loss) 9 (-10702.00)
Maximum continuous profits (number of wins) 13183.40 (11) continuous losses (number of losses) -10702.00 (9)
Average continuous gain 2 continuous loss 2
We can say the following -
The total profit is almost equal to the total loss, winning trades are comparable to losing trades, the biggest profitable trade is equal to the biggest losing trade, the average profitable trade is equal to the average losing trade and so on. And all this at a drawdown of 73%. The Expert Advisor is completely unstable in its work. And if we consider that the modeling quality is 25%, then there is no guarantee, because when the modeling quality reaches 100% (or when you set it on a real account), everything may very dramatically change and the EA will simply lose everything. That's what your BMM shows. ))))