You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Denis, I'm not afraid for the world. It's more interesting to search when you know where not to do it.
It may be that this should not be done anywhere).
The task needs to be simplified, trimmed with Occam's razor...
All that remains is to find probable entry-exit points which give a positive result on a small series of trades. A series of transactions implies small volumes, which would easily withstand losses before the revenge. On large TFs such conditions are easy to find, but the profit will not be so high... The grail? That's not much... and that's where greed comes in...
Not only is it possible to come to your senses in time, but with the right approach you can also make money )))) True, not much, but still ....)))
such as?
You can not only come to your senses, but with the right approach you can also make money )))) True not much, but still ....)))
it's hard)))
Let's take a simple system for a breakout of a trailing extremum with a short stop (10p for example) and a bigger profit and a quick transfer to Breakeven. It has been working for the last couple of years and some made good money on it. Is it worth to bet on it now for example? :)
it's hard))))
Let's take a simple system for a breakout of a trailing extremum with a short stop (10p for example) and a bigger profit and a quick transfer to Breakeven. It has been working for the last couple of years and some made good money on it. Is it worth to bet on it now for example? :)
It still works, but it didn't work before 2008 for some reason
No Wednesday, no commissions, but the loss is enormous.
this one needs to trade)))
No Wednesday, no commissions, but the loss is enormous.
It works, but it didn't work before 2008 for some reason
before that the minutes were left)))
This one should be traded)))
Leonid, do you think a large number of small items has any advantages over a single item of equivalent size? For example: 100 positions of 0.01 lots and 1 position of 1 lot size.