THE NEW NIPPLE SYSTEM! - page 12

New comment
 
FoxUA:

I have got a good reason why on the screenshot I am showing plus and not a small one, but according to your knowledge try to follow your words there should be minus or at least 0

My answer to you is: "Do not fool yourself. Once again read my post above.
Once again, read it in full:

Search for and read: "The basics of margin trading in currencies".

(Do not confuse currency and currency pair).

Once you have read about it you will understand that the "new Nippel system" (as stated by the topicstarter) is profitable for the brokerage company and unprofitable for the trader - WITHOUT any variations, exceptions, hope, luck or anything else.

(in other words, there is no spread and swap to gain here)

(in other words, if you exclude swap and spread, then the result of one-timed trading (buying and then selling) of opposite pairs or a set of opposite pairs will be exactly zero)

(your case here -->) (and lastly, the one-step trading not a complete set of opposite pairs is reduced to trading one pair. the result of such trading is fully determined by the market dynamics and the chosen direction of the pairs included in the initial set)

 
abolk:
My answer to you is: "Don't fool yourself.

I don't get it, I'm not fooling anyone, let alone myself, you have a log explanation, if anyone doubts I can give you the password
 
FoxUA:

I don't get it, I'm not fooling anyone, let alone myself, you have a log explanation, if in doubt I can give you the password

answered above
 

(your case is here -->) (and lastly, one-step trading not a complete set of opposite pairs is reduced to trading one pair. the result of such trading is fully determined by the market dynamics and the chosen direction of the pairs included in the initial set)
now in russian and with pictures
 
FoxUA:
And now in Russian and with pictures.


Oh, it's a tough job pulling a behemoth out of a swamp.

I'll pass.

 
abolk:


Eh, it's a tough job dragging a hippo out of a swamp

I'll pass.

but it's all right to discuss what nobody wants.
 

Here's a hedge strategy that's not bad if you're interested,

Period 1 Hour (H1) 2010.05.21 19:00 - 2010.08.06 22:00 (2009.12.17 - 2010.08.07)
Model All ticks (most accurate method based on all smallest available timeframes)
Bars in history 1413 Modelled ticks 817984 Modeling quality 46.50%
Chart mismatch errors 0
Initial deposit 10000.00
Net profit 35542.64 Total profit 119652.08 Total loss -84109.44
Profitability 1.42 Expectation of winning 57.14
Absolute drawdown 9408.39 Maximum drawdown 10854.81 (94.83%) Relative drawdown 94.83% (10854.81)
Total trades 622 Short positions (% win) 320 (45.63%) Long positions (% win) 302 (46.36%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 286 (45.98%) Loss trades (% of all) 336 (54.02%)
Largest profitable trade 3781.06 losing transaction -1871.28
Average profitable deal 418.36 losing deal -250.33
Maximum number continuous wins (profit) 2 (119.99) continuous losses (loss) 3 (-659.96)
Maximum continuous profits (number of wins) 3781.06 (1) Continuous loss (number of losses) -2759.78 (2)
Average continuous winnings 1 continuous loss 1

 
FoxUA:

Here's a hedge strategy that's not bad if you're interested,

Period1 Hour (H1) 2010.05.21 19:00 - 2010.08.06 22:00 (2009.12.17 - 2010.08.07)
ModelAll ticks (most accurate method based on all smallest available timeframes)
Bars in history1413Modelled ticks817984Modeling quality46.50%
Chart mismatch errors0
Initial deposit10000.00
Net profit35542.64Total profit119652.08Total loss-84109.44
Profitability1.42Expectation of winning57.14
Absolute drawdown9408.39Maximum drawdown10854.81 (94.83%)Relative drawdown94.83% (10854.81)
Total trades622Short positions (% win)320 (45.63%)Long positions (% win)302 (46.36%)
Profitable trades (% of all)286 (45.98%)Loss trades (% of all)336 (54.02%)
Largestprofitable trade3781.06losing transaction-1871.28
Averageprofitable deal418.36losing deal-250.33
Maximum numbercontinuous wins (profit)2 (119.99)continuous losses (loss)3 (-659.96)
Maximumcontinuous profits (number of wins)3781.06 (1)Continuous loss (number of losses)-2759.78 (2)
Averagecontinuous winnings1continuous loss1
Maximum drawdown greater than the initial deposit :-(
 
khorosh:
Maximum drawdown is greater than the initial deposit :-(
i got it, but the drawdown varies with the deposit, i put it too close to the limit, who wants to trade with smaller amounts and the draw will be smaller
1...56789101112
New comment