EURUSD - Trends, Forecasts and Implications (Part 2) - page 1243

 
forte i.e. 100% up to 1.335 will not go lower?
 
rysstigra:

where's the mistake?
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/126769/page1232 there are posts on this page with the correct woolfs
 
Tantrik:
I don't recognise the wolf as such. What I think - diagonal slice channel - 2 woolfs - one channel - channels are more reliable than halves. Further, woolfs are trends on tops - there are trends - true, false, temporary, high (I have one point each). Wolfs are part of channels, channels are part of a trend TS, but trends are part of the next TS (but it's a secret - I won't tell)

so i have a trend from the last wolf trimmed the tops and so full of currents
 
rysstigra:
Tantric, do you have a standard Bolinger??? and what do you think of my picture on Wolf???


The build is correct only I have the build on the bodies - which makes the price levels more accurate +\-4% of the move

prices to the target point

 
terentyevdd:
Forte, i.e. 100% till 1.335, we will not go lower?


We will go lower and there is no pivot on H4 yet

 
rysstigra:

So I've got a trendy one from the last wolf, but it's full of currents.
What don't you understand?
 
odiseif:
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/126769/page1232 there are posts on this page with the correct woolfs

yes i have seen it all, it may not be correct but the profit is there and it is worked out))))
 
forte928No, I mean up to 1.335 first and then downwards only right? Or am I misunderstanding again?
 
rysstigra:

yes i have seen it all, it may not be correctly drawn, but the profit has been made and it has been worked out))))
wow ...it doesn't matter how it's drawn ...as long as the result is ......
 
forte928:


Construction is correct only I have body-based construction - which makes more accurate price levels +\-4% of the move

prices to the target point


I'll keep that in mind.