EURUSD - Trends, Forecasts and Implications (Part 2) - page 1633
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Thank you)Let's wait for the moment))
The moment was yesterday.
But it may be so:
Unlikely to go above B... I've already got a signal coming down....... So we wait, I think it will form by tonight...
I think so too, I did not write yesterday evening that the price and time converged near the level, but it's possible, they may meet again on the way down))))
Tried to do something with Cowan, but it turned out to be a coffin for euros))))
Interesting article http://digest.subscribe.ru/economics/society/n477156820.html
The moment was yesterday.
But it may be so:
admit it, you can't help but feel that it's going to hit the top)
Admit it, you can't help but feel what's going to hit you up))
You have to look, not feel))) If it hits, it'll hit the boo and that's the end of it.
Tried to do something with Cowan, but it turned out to be a coffin for euros))))
Interesting article http://digest.subscribe.ru/economics/society/n477156820.html
What about GBPUSD ?
No, I've sold twice and both times on boo.
Hackers broke into the computer system of the NASDAQ OMX stock exchange. The hackers were only looking into the exchange's electronics, but did not take advantage of any information.
Hackers have repeatedly hacked into NASDAQ's computer network over the past year, the WSJ reported Saturday. The exchange also made a statement to customers following the publication. During an internal audit, NASDAQ staff found suspicious files on the service, which allows traders to communicate with each other and store documents.
"The files were immediately removed and at this time there is no confirmation that hackers gained access to customer information," NASDAQ said in a statement, "Our trading platform operates independently of services that have access to the internet. None of the trading platforms were hacked, NASDAQ claimed.
Authorities asked NASDAQ not to disclose the network hack to customers until February 14 to facilitate the investigation. "After the story of the hacking incident at NASDAQ appeared in the press on Saturday, after consulting with the authorities, we decided that we should inform customers," the exchange said.
The investigation into the hacking of the NASDAQ computer system was launched by the US Secret Service, later joined by the FBI, which eventually took the lead. Authorities are looking at a wide range of possible motives, including generating illicit income, stealing trade secrets and threatening national security by harming the exchange. "Apparently, the perpetrators were only looking around," says a member of the investigation. Another source compares the miscreants to thieves breaking into a house, wandering around but taking nothing.
Authorities are concerned about this behaviour by the hackers as they remain unsure as to whether they have been able to close all the holes in the computer system. The most sophisticated hackers are increasingly targeting financial institutions, particularly those associated with trading, notes Tom Kellerman, a former World Bank computer security specialist and now at Core Security Technologies. "Many sophisticated hackers are not trying to exploit the situation immediately for profit, they are often gathering information to figure out how to capitalise on their presence in the system in the long term," he notes.
Authorities have not yet been able to name the hackers or the country where their computers are installed. Some indications point to Russia, sources close to the investigation say, but this only means that the people who carried out the attack may have used computers
in Russia, but they themselves could be from any country.
Stock exchanges are now often the target of hacking attacks. "We take any potential threat seriously and continue to work to make sure that our systems operate at the highest level of security and integrity," says Ray Pellecchia, spokesman for the largest US stock exchange, NYSE Euronext.
The security of computer systems should not only be the responsibility of the exchanges themselves, but also of regulators, market participants believe. "It's scary to think that a major electronic exchange could be hacked," says Jack Eblin, chief investment officer at Harris Private Bank. The May flash crash has undermined investor confidence, he notes. "There doesn't seem to be anything the SEC can do," Eblin adds, "the regulator is a paper tiger" (quoted by Reuters).
That's the story. Who's hacking?
Hackers broke into the computer system of the NASDAQ OMX stock exchange. The hackers were only looking into the exchange's electronics, but did not take advantage of any information.
Hackers have repeatedly hacked into NASDAQ's computer network over the past year, the WSJ reported Saturday. The exchange also made a statement to customers following the publication. During an internal audit, NASDAQ staff discovered suspicious files on the service, which allows traders to communicate with each other and store documents.
"The files were immediately removed and at this time there is no confirmation that hackers gained access to customer information," NASDAQ said in a statement, "Our trading platform operates independently of services that have access to the internet. None of the trading platforms were hacked, NASDAQ claimed.
Authorities asked NASDAQ not to disclose the network hack to customers until February 14 to facilitate the investigation. "After the story of the hacking incident at NASDAQ appeared in the press on Saturday, after consulting with the authorities, we decided that we should inform customers," the exchange said.
The investigation into the hacking of the NASDAQ computer system was launched by the US Secret Service, later joined by the FBI, which eventually took the lead. Authorities are looking at a wide range of possible motives, including generating illicit income, stealing trade secrets and threatening national security by harming the exchange. "Apparently, the perpetrators were only looking around," says a member of the investigation. Another source compares the miscreants to thieves breaking into a house, wandering around but taking nothing.
Authorities are concerned about this behaviour by the hackers as they remain unsure as to whether they have been able to close all the holes in the computer system. The most sophisticated hackers are increasingly targeting financial institutions, particularly those associated with trading, notes Tom Kellerman, a former World Bank computer security specialist and now at Core Security Technologies. "Many sophisticated hackers are not trying to exploit the situation immediately for profit, they are often gathering information to figure out how to capitalise on their presence in the system in the long term," he notes.
Authorities have not yet been able to name the hackers or the country where their computers are installed. Some indications point to Russia, sources close to the investigation say, but this only means that the people who carried out the attack may have used computers
in Russia, but they themselves could be from any country.
Stock exchanges are now often the target of hacking attacks. "We take any potential threat seriously and continue to work to make sure that our systems operate at the highest level of security and integrity," says Ray Pellecchia, spokesman for the largest US stock exchange, NYSE Euronext.
The security of computer systems should not only be the responsibility of the exchanges themselves, but also of regulators, market participants believe. "It's scary to think that a major electronic exchange could be hacked," says Jack Eblin, chief investment officer at Harris Private Bank. The May flash crash has undermined investor confidence, he notes. "There doesn't seem to be anything the SEC can do," Eblin adds, "the regulator is a paper tiger" (quoted by Reuters).
That's the story. Who's hacking?
Recker, probably haven't seen him here in a while, now I see what he's up to)))