Is the advisor suitable for real life? - page 50
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
That's how it's going to be. The languages are different, you have to rewrite them all over again.
But generally speaking VBA should be faster than MQL4. I.e. if you put calculations in dll and connect it to MQL4 code, it will probably be faster.
I'm not talking about Office, I'm talking specifically about VBA.
And MQL4 is slower than C by 5-10 times, if I'm not much mistaken.
I'm not talking about Office, I'm talking specifically about VBA.
And MQL4 is 5-10 times slower than C, if I'm not much mistaken.
VB for Application (VBA)?
Or VB (Microsoft Studio)?
О)
VB for Application (VBA)?
or VB (Microsoft Studio)?
О)
I think I went too far with VBA. It doesn't really look like a fast language.
But VB .NET should just be about on par with other MS studio products, i.e. faster than MQL4.
If it's 90% then we'll have a chat.
Trying)))) --> 89.13% pull???:
Strategy Tester Report
Super
Alpari-NDD-Demo (Build 409)
Symbol
EURUSD (Euro vs US Dollar)
Period
4 Hour (H4) 1999.11.23 16:00 - 2011.11.21 08:00
Model
Control points (very rough method, results cannot be taken into account)
Bars in history
18800
Modelled ticks
925868
Modeling quality
n/a
Chart mismatch errors
40
Initial deposit
10000.00
Net profit
4197974.50
Total profit
7279011.40
Total loss
-3081036.90
Profitability
2.36
Expectation of winning
40.27
Absolute drawdown
118.60
Maximum drawdown
3063.60 (0.67%)
Relative drawdown
11.34% (1290.70)
Total trades
104252
Short positions (% win)
51568 (88.63%)
Long positions (% win)
52684 (89.62%)
Profitable trades (% of all)
92919 (89.13%)
Loss trades (% of all)
11333 (10.87%)
Largest
profitable trade
1880.40
losing deal
-1528.00
Average
profitable deal
78.34
losing trade
-271.86
Maximum number
continuous wins (profit)
115 (12179.60)
Continuous losses (loss)
7 (-1304.90)
Maximum
Continuous Profit (number of wins)
13778.10 (102)
Continuous loss (number of losses)
-2118.00 (2)
Average
continuous winnings
11
continuous loss
1
Trying:
Trying on checkpoints yes with errors of agreement?) Don't be ridiculous, at least take the opening prices.
Yes and enough of these tests about nothing. At the beginning of page 48 I showed that in the tester you can make a test with any characteristics. In principle anyone here can do it. So why are you laying it all out? Who are you proving what to? No need. We believe)
We are trying))) --> 89.13% will do???:
Wrong. Especially when you consider that the average profitable trade is 3.5 times less than the average losing trade. Cheating however (I admit that unintentionally, i.e. due to ignorance).
It's easy to make an Expert Advisor with 95% of profitable trades - and it will be a losing one. Do you understand?
P.S. Just saw it: theXpert wasn't asking about that, he was asking about the quality of the modelling! Watch the context, sir!