Avalanche - page 388
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Try turning your processor on somehow, maybe you should stick it in the cold or tap it
Let me explain... (notwithstanding your, which has become a standard here, cautionary-sarcastic, if not mocking tone)
The assumption of applicability of Bernouli's scheme was put into models, which won the Nobel Prize, but as it turned out, they don't quite work.
Alexey writes about it too. ;)
But if we remember Tukey.
Therefore we communicate, ask questions and sometimes get answers, and share the results.
And turning the forum into a place for exclusive exercises in rhetoric and mockery - it is fundamentally wrong.
There are, however, a few such threads/journals, such as "Humor" or "Netrobov's".
;)
It is impossible to prove the ineffectiveness of an avalanche, especially when you consider that this strategy does not prohibit entering using thechanalysis. You can imagine 1000s of losing EAs,
created using an avalanche, but this will not be proof of the ineffectiveness of this principle. But one profitable EA is enough to prove the effectiveness of this principle.
You have not answered my question.
Would you mind?
And turning the forum into a place for exclusive exercises in rhetoric and sneering is fundamentally wrong.
You are the one who exercises rhetoric in the first place. You also allow yourself, in spite of the "You", "You will" and "Therefore", to deceive forum members.
I think this is not the least of the reasons why you are treated so frivolously.
And I just find it hard to read threads involving you, that's why I cling.
Let me explain... (notwithstanding your, which has already become a standard here, cautionary-sarcastic, if not mocking tone)
The assumption of applicability of Bernouli's scheme was put into models, which won the Nobel Prize, but as it turned out, they don't quite work.
Alexey writes about it too. ;)
But if we remember Tukey.
Therefore we communicate, ask questions and sometimes get answers, and share the results.
And turning the forum into a place for exclusive exercises in rhetoric and mockery - it is fundamentally wrong.
There are, however, a few such threads/smoking rooms, such as Humor or Netrobov's.
;)
You can get by with a secondary school if you include the CPU.
That's it, gone back to humour.
You are the one who practises rhetoric in the first place. You also allow yourself, in spite of the "You", "You will" and "Therefore", to deceive forum members.
I think this is not the least of the reasons why you are treated so frivolously.
And I just find it hard to read threads involving you, that's why I'm clinging.
:О)
Do you have evidence of deception?
:О)
Is there evidence of deception?
For example, several nicknames. Then a mismatch between your nicknames and your name as a seller. And then there's the deceit in your posts. Once you lie, who's going to believe you?
And then, how can you address a person who hides his name as "you"?
You are the one who exercises rhetoric in the first place. You also allow yourself, in spite of the "You", "You will" and "Therefore", to deceive forum members.
I think this is not the least of the reasons why you are treated so frivolously.
And I just find it hard to read threads involving you, that's why I'm clinging.
FreeLance:
I'm not. ;)
Either it's a spelling mistake or it's intellectually baffling.
It is impossible to prove the inefficiency of an avalanche, especially when you consider that this strategy does not prohibit entering using thechanalysis. You can imagine 1000s of losing experts,
created using an avalanche, but this will not be proof of the ineffectiveness of this principle. But all it takes is one profitable EA to prove the effectiveness of this principle.
Here is an arch-profitable strategy: buy cheap, sell expensive.
Try to prove the ineffectiveness of such a system.
---
Your words are just "blah blah blah". Nothing more. Otherwise you wouldn't be "not working in the summer".
For example, multiple nicknames. Then the mismatch between your nicknames and your name as a seller. Then there's the deceit in your posts. Once lied to, who's going to believe you?
I'm not selling anything yet. I've ceded my creative rights to the locs to the customer. :)
Helped out a fellow forum member... Kept the link.
ISU, what's the problem? Any questions?
Write in a sketch. And given that we're from the same city, we can meet.