Avalanche - page 120

 
khorosh >>:

Вы сейчас как закрываетесь ?

I am closing with a takeprofit calculated from statistical data.

 
genfed писал(а) >>
I am not using it at the moment, but I plan to pick appropriate one. It would be red to watch the price crawling without me. What do you advise?

Try a simple trailing KimIV. You have to pick it up as well. But it may not increase profit. With big trailing stop we lose much, and with small trailing stop we gain less.

 
coaster писал(а) >>

What an avalanche, what an avalanche!!!! Thought we were doing something serious here, but this is bullshit. :)))))))
I made 10 times my deposit last week on one trade, too. So what? The week before last, I made 50 in one trade. How cool is that? What's with all the bullshit you got going on around here? What's your chemistry?

For the diversification of the Expert Advisor portfolio, it may be useful,, even if you do not consider it with a very high profitability. You have to have lots and lots of EAs.
с 01.01.08 -01.04.10

 
khorosh >>:

Попробуйте простой трейлинг KimIV. Тоже надо подбирать. Но прибыль он может и не увеличит. При большом трейлингстопе много теряем, при маленьком раннее срабатывание-тоже недополучаем.

Please give me a link to it

 
genfed >>:
Вчера наткнулся на эту ветку и узнал, что стратегия, по которой я успешно работаю на торговом счете уже в течение года называется "Лавина". За год мне удалось поднять начальный депозит в 16000 руб примерно в три раза. У меня несколько иной вход. В промежутке от 0 до 6 часов по максимуму и минимуму цены я провожу две параллельные линии и включаю советник, который, при пересечении ценой линии открывает ордер и одновременно на противоположной стороне канала ставит отложенный ордер лотом в 2 раза больше. При перевороте цены лотов удваиваются.
Эта стратегия рискованная, но имеет право на жизнь. Попробуйте на EURUSD проторгуйте вручную на истории примерно год и убедитесь сами.

What kind of nerves do you have? 00.00-06.00 is nothing new. Passive decision-making. I've had some pretty good results. I gave up. I gave up precisely because I had to "catch up" with increasing (multiples of) lots.

 
nikat97 писал(а) >>

Please give me a link to it.

See https://www.mql5.com/go?link=http://www.kimiv.ru//
 
Mathemat >>:

Об оценке любой пипсовки я вообще не говорю, т.к. тут слишком много нерыночных факторов (политики ДЦ).

It seems that if it were not for these non-market factors, it would be very easy to make money by trading.
Give me an example of a single strategy that makes money in the market.
Let it open hundreds of orders on every tick and make thousands of requests.
I am amazed that so much time on the forex topic people are still struggling additionally with non-market factors instead of struggling only with the market.
Apparently, they are forced to trade in kitchens.
 
getch писал(а) >>
I get the feeling that if it were not for these non-market factors, it would be very easy to make money by trading.
Give me an example of a single strategy that makes money in the market.
Let it open hundreds of orders on every tick and make thousands of requests.
I am amazed that so much time on the topic of forex people are still struggling additionally with non-market factors instead of struggling only with the market.
Apparently, they are forced to trade in kitchens.


I totally agree
 
khorosh >>:

Смотрите на сайте https://www.mql5.com/go?link=http://www.kimiv.ru//

Thank you

 
nikat97 писал(а) >>

Please give me a link to it.


You can try the trawl snare I made by introducing a small addition (one line) to the simple KimIV trawl. https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/121869 last post.
Trailing stop does not need to be entered in external variables, it is calculated inside the function. Only in this case takeprofit should be necessarily applied and it needs to be picked or calculated. You can see on the demo how the trawl snare tightens the loop beautifully :-)))