You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What's up guys - it's New Year's Eve, who's selling/not selling "tanks :-)"?
... on Avalanche. Avalanche - do/no?
What's up guys - it's New Year's Eve, who's selling/not selling "tanks :-)"?
... on Avalanche. Avalanche - do/no?
I've been turning these avalanches both ways, with and without indicators. However, I failed to achieve, let alone surpass, the results obtained with the averaging tools. Avalanche does not rule, averaging tools do. This means that the market is in a sideways trend.
I see.
70%! :-)
It happens, even in the eurofoundation:
I'll be posting my battle-turned-robot on Avalanche and reports in the Villagers' branch soon.
I think - a lot from bezotkat - rules, IMHO. There, however, the profitability is "not enough" (but - in general - enough!!!!!!!), based on the generally accepted annual percentage of thousands...
It is necessary to apply it to arms - EVERYWHERE!
Google
Googled it - can't find it now - have a look at something similar:
"Calculation of minimum rebound hrenfx site:mql4.com".
There's a lot to work with...
Found it, for fuck's sake:
Found it, for fuck's sake:
I think he's had a lot of use... you can't lose your talent...
Found it, for fuck's sake:
You can do without this script, I, for example, can do without it. I run a test and determine the zone with maximal drawdown(I have a special function for that) - it is the zone of maximal drawdown. I select parameters, size of initial deposit, initial lot, coefficient of lot increase, distance between orders so that the drawdown in this part was acceptable for me.