Avalanche - page 376
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
This is not the bleakness of the other famous thread. Elliot, Neely... ))) That was more fun. More fun for sure!!! ))))))))))))))
...to top it off...
(
FreeLance:
So your definition of "bullshit" is unsubstantiated!
As for evidence: going over the same topics a hundred times over -- I have no desire to do so.
If you are incapable of calculating and comparing multiple values, that's your problem, not mine.
P.S. I'm telling you once again, re-read the thread.
Yes, yes, that's exactly what I was saying, Swetten: khorosh's options are no longerLovina.
You don't know what it is at all. Just pretty pictures. :)
About the evidence: I have no desire to go over the same topics a hundred times.
If you are incapable of calculating and comparing multiple values, that's your problem, not mine.
P.S. I'm telling you again -- re-read the thread.
The proof of your "babbling" can be considered complete...
Too bad. I thought you were sincere in your knowledge.
Turns out it's "dumb-ass," "believe it or not."
What's the difference between you and Cathal?
The side of the barricade?
___
Understand! You need proof!
Otherwise crowds of neophytes will be "caught" by it.
Position averaging, aka martingale.
I clearly understand that I am unlikely to be understood by anyone, as no one here has dealt with net positioning.
But maybe I'll be lucky enough to have an explanation.
So. You can do averaging and martingale. But only in the context of certain analysis of correction. I.e.! In no case you cannot average against the current movement. But during correction you are welcome.
Yes... There's also loki... No. I certainly don't want to discuss that. Morons will always be morons - there's nothing you can do to help them.
So.
There is a martingale in its worst meaning, and there is a build-up of position. These are DIFFERENT THINGS. But to do this, you have to at least know WHICH LIGHT YOU'RE IN - what's going on in the market right now. Otherwise, it won't be all that different from "eagle-eyed". So - TA is for that. Not to tell you when you're driving a white Mercedes to an equally white yacht.
You know who the TA doesn't work? They're the loser dreamers.
The proof of your "jibber-jabber" may be considered complete...
Pity. I thought you were sincere in your knowledge.
Turns out to be "dubel-dubble", "believe it or not".
What's the difference between you and Cathal?
The side of the barricade?
___
Understand! You need proof!
Otherwise, there'll be crowds of neophytes who'll get caught up in it.
What a man!
Our dialogue:
-- Try reading the thread from the beginning. It's all there, repeatedly.
-- do you have proof? Or plausible reasoning? The mathematician also sort of doubts, and refers to his inclinations. So your definition of "bullshit" is unproven! The proof of your "baloney" may be considered complete...
One request -- two questions and three (!) conclusions.
Pity. I thought you were sincere in your knowledge.
But it turned out to be "dubel-empty", "believe it or not".
You don't have to think. You have to read and analyze.
Have you read this thread? All of it? I suspect not.
Because all the answers are in there. Repeatedly.
"Give me proof." It's like a cuckoo's cuckoo -- throw it all in, chew it up, and shove it down his throat!
Position averaging, aka martingale.
I clearly understand that I am unlikely to be understood by anyone, as no one here has dealt with net positioning.
But maybe I'll be lucky enough to have an explanation.
So. You can do averaging and martingale. But only in the context of certain analysis of correction. I.e.! In no case you cannot average against the current movement. But during correction you are welcome.
Yes... There's also loki... No. I definitely don't want to discuss that. Morons will always be morons - there's nothing you can do to help them.
So.
There is a martingale in its worst meaning, and there is a build-up of position. These are DIFFERENT THINGS. But to do this, you have to at least know WHICH LIGHT YOU'RE IN - what's going on in the market right now. Otherwise, it won't be all that different from "eagle-eyed". So - TA is for that. Not to tell you when you're driving a white Mercedes to an equally white yacht.
You know who the TA doesn't work? They're the loser dreamers.
Piglet! You are in your greatness of a "vanishing civilisation" (c) C.Lem "The Sum of Technology"
You don't want to hear the subject of the argument.
TA is 5% success rate. And I personally think even less than 2-3%.
The rest is MM.
But I'm stuck, again, because of the cliquishness in discussing certain issues.
Pity it again comes down to a poll of "public" opinion. Not evidence.
And the same "revolutionary expediency"...
"Give me the proof." He's like a cuckoo - throw it all down, chew it up and push it down his throat!
Stop being so sarcastic.
Just quote the proof!
if you can't articulate it yourself.
;)
Your level of knowledge of the subject and the branch cannot be undone.
I beg your pardon. But that's a fact.
Stop being so sarcastic...
Just quote me!
;)
Your level of knowledge of the subject and the branch is irrefutable.
I beg your pardon. But it is a fact.
Well, if it can't be undone, then go read it.
I don't owe you anything.
Also a fact.
Well, if you can't cancel it, then go read it.
I don't owe you anything.
Also a fact.
I don't.
But you PUBLICLY support the conclusion that you are "ahit".
It would be advisable to justify it from now on.
For neophytes and those who have joined in.