It's impossible to make money on Forox!!! - page 37
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What's more, I've been through this before. It has been correctly noted here that if one has the ability to generate adequate synthetics, it practically means complete knowledge of the market. If there is such knowledge, then synthetics are no longer needed, for testing. It's much easier to just chop dough.
:(
So you don't get it.
HideYourRichess, that's not true at all. Knowing a random process and being able to predict it (or rather take profit from it) are two big differences.
And here's another idea that doesn't require any generation. Part of the idea has been borrowed from Avals.
The method is called the "one deal method" (that's what I've called it). We simply take the available history as long as possible. And then we randomly choose short pieces from it whose length is nearly equal to the length of one deal. Of course, we control opening and closing of deals on such a slice. And we collect statistics on trade results.
We do not need to take care of intersections of sections, we do not need to generate anything.
HideYourRichess, that's not true at all. Knowing a random process and being able to predict it (or rather take profit from it) are two big differences.
To know is to be able to predict. The rest of "knowing" is brain masturbation. Let's think for a second why one studies anything.
And here's another idea that doesn't require any generation. Part of the idea has been borrowed from Avals.
The method is called the "one deal method" (this is how I've called it). We simply take the longest available history. And then we randomly choose short pieces from it whose length is nearly equal to the length of one deal. Of course, we control opening and closing of deals on such a slice. And we collect statistics on trade results.
We don't need to care about intersections and we don't need to generate anything.
I can predict the outcome of all this action! ;) With very high accuracy.
And here's another idea that doesn't require any generation. Part of the idea is borrowed from Avals.
The method is called the "one deal method" (that's what I called it). We simply take the available history as long as possible. And then we randomly choose short pieces from it whose length is nearly equal to the length of one deal. Of course, we control opening and closing of deals on such a slice. And we collect statistics on trade results.
We don't need to care about intersections and we don't need to generate anything.
How does this help in testing adaptive EAs and identifying their weaknesses? Didn't understand anything from your post, but just in case - loved it! :)
To know is to be able to predict. The rest of "knowing" is brain masturbation.
Starting with Einstein and Wiener, the highbrow know very well what Brownian motion is. It does not help them to predict it. The specifics of the Wiener process is that it is a random process, not a deterministic function.
2 joo: sorry, totally forgot that you want to test adaptive EAs.
Well, in short, I'll pass. I can't help you with anything sensible.
............
Well, in short, I'll pass. Can't do anything useful.
Don't lie, you're just not interested. ;)
"There is nothing more practical than a good theory" - this phrase was fondly repeated by Academician Nikolay Bogolyubov, Director of the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in Dubna, - as if justifying the work of theoretical physicists that is understood only by a narrow circle of specialists - and the results of this work can serve as a vivid and demonstrative confirmation of this very practicality.
.
The idea of introducing a modulating search signal is well known and has been working for a long time.
We are talking about extreme search systems.
But there are, of course, limitations.
The idea of introducing a modulating search signal is well known and has worked for a long time.
We are talking about search extremes.
Can you be a little more specific here, Oleg?