"The 'perfect' trading system - page 16
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
"Profit is nothing" - and then it goes on for 15 pages :)
It's not just losses that can be managed.
But in essence - the slogan is still true. Not everybody wants to search for the essence of it - people are too lazy to search for it.
The right one, given the corresponding equity. Not true for the equity you have.
In general, for example, in the experience of many traders, with a loss of up to 30% - to recover is real, with a loss of 50% - to recover is very difficult, with a loss of 70% - to recover is almost unreal....
Leon, but there is a PAMM, which demonstrated that it is possible to recover even with a loss of 90%. Here is the link, by the way. It recovered to zero. Another thing is that I couldn't help myself.
It's not a myth - it's a harsh reality, as long as you keep the MM within a leverage of 1:5 and don't play the casino game called forex luck or bad luck.....
If, if, if...
The only way I understand "if" is this: "if you can open new positions, then you can trade" - everything else is bogus.
Lenya, there is a PAMM which has demonstrated that it is possible to recover even with a loss of 90%. Here is the link, by the way. He recovered to zero. Another thing is that I did not hold out.
Alexey, of course I agree with you. You can. Anything is possible. But how much work, nerves and time does it take? And what's the point if you fall anyway? .....)))))
If, if, if...
The only way I understand "if" is this: "if you can open new positions, then you can trade" - everything else is bogus.
There is nothing wrong with the word "if". So we should not focus on it, because we can only assume something for now, based on the facts and our experience, which we have.....
To DC2008 But suppose I have no losses, what do I manage now or is my system not perfect after that ???
No losses are a special case. But Kozma Prutkov warned: "Get to the root", while you are only trying to see the tip of the twig.
The right way to put it is "losses tend to zero", i.e. the management system is so good that the losses, at certain periods, are nullified.Anything can be justified and you have demonstrated it brilliantly :)
You have written "a hodgepodge of nonsense" and passed it off as "the truth in the last resort".
By the way, "over-sit" is a purely human term, masculine. It comes from the fact that it is difficult for people-traders to sit on a chair in front of the monitor and wait for a position to close - they can sit for something much more useful, than profit :)
I didn't actually justify anything. I pointed out the need for justification.
Anything at all cannot be justified. It goes against common sense, because otherwise you can simultaneously prove that the same statement is both true and false.
But from you I asked you to prove mathematically your trading theory (or rather that it works). Simply testing the EA doesn't satisfy me. I don't understand why the hypothesis is used that if a trade was unprofitable, it is worth reversing the trade. Why exactly a ring buffer of 8 elements in length is used? Why is the start of "adaptation" with a real trade? After all, you can run a few virtual trades, choose the best initial direction of trade (you have it fixed). Collect statistics (just do not use the weekly history, please), post it and explain (preferably organize a separate thread, because the concept of "ideal" trading system is unlikely to be applicable to a system with this kind of drawdown). If your goal is to attract investors - it is in your interest to convince people not so much with phrases like "you don't understand"/ "you just haven't understood", but with indisputable facts.
You can stick to your opinion, it is not my intention to convince you. And I recommend you to go to constructive explanations, and not to "sit through" forum masses' brouhaha ;)
But how much work, nerve and time does it take? Is it necessary if you are going to fall anyway? .....)))))
This conclusion is not justified by anything other than "most people drain - so everyone will someday drain".
However, if drawdowns/losses are under control, it is possible not to fall down, because there is a clear knowledge (+- some margin of error) of where the "bottom" is, in any random turn of events.
I have no need to be understood and supported - I am self-sufficient.
[...]
There is no OTT manual yet. I have so far only covered the Adaptive EA newsletter, i.e. there is no well-structured material on OTT.
[...]
I can answer questions if there are any. Basically, it's simple.
Fine, I'm self-sufficient too. But I will still have the need to be understood - even when I become a millionaire.
So let's slowly gather it, OTT, right here. So, questions:
1. What is an eigenfunction (s.f.) in OTT? (I know what it is from mathematics: it is, roughly speaking, some function invariant to certain admissible transformations. Which transformations are we talking about here?)
2. What is the synchronisation of s.f. with the market?
It's very touching... It does! The people here are just over the moon. So, in a daze from such revelations and write page after page.
Chekhov is remembered here. There was a doctor there - Andrei Efimovich. At first he kind of treated fools, but then he got into them himself. Ward No.6 is the story called.
Maybe if you're still able, you'd better stop. Otherwise, like that doctor...