"The 'perfect' trading system - page 3

 
LeoV >> :

Four trades can be used to judge the repeatability of a result?


You can even do it by one :)

If there are 100 trades on the history and then one after the launch on the real, then we can say that the launch was successful.

Even if this trade is a stop loss, because the losses are also assumed by the algorithm.

The essence is not in trades, but in the correctness of the algorithm.

 
VictorArt писал(а) >>

No offence mate, don't get distracted, save investors money on your PAMM

 
VictorArt писал(а) >>

You can even do it one at a time :)

If there are 100 trades on the history and then one after the launch on the real, then we can say that the launch was successful.

Even if this trade is a stop loss, because losses are also assumed by the algorithm.

The point is not the trades, but the correctness of the algorithm.

Yeah, because investors are not interested in profit, but only in the correctness of the algorithm, then everything is OK......))))

 
sever29 >> :

No offence mate, don't get distracted, save investors' money on your PAMM


No offence :)

"The dough is saved by adaptive trading robots, and I'm sort of not involved at all - just observing the process.

 
LeoV >> :

Yeah, since investors are not interested in profit but only in the correctness of the algorithm, then it's OK......


Is it possible to make a profit without the correctness of the algorithm? :)

I do not know about you, but with us - first of all, correctness and reliability, and only then "possible profit".

Anyone who thinks otherwise is out of the way :)

 
VictorArt писал(а) >>

Is it possible to make a profit without getting the algorithm right? :)

I don't know about you, but with us it's correctness and reliability first, and only then "possible profit".

Anyone who thinks otherwise is out of the way with us :)

What if the algorithm sucks? Didn't you study such a case?

 
VictorArt писал(а) >>

No hard feelings :)

"The dough is saved by adaptive trading robots, and I'm sort of not involved at all - just observing the process.

There! Investors! Enjoy... Is that your spammy motto?

 
LeoV >> :

What if the algorithm sucks? You haven't studied such a case?


It happens :)

But it's a matter of luck - not everyone is destined to be a billionaire.

 
VictorArt писал(а) >>

It happens :)

But it's a matter of luck - not everyone is destined to be a billionaire.

I see. But that's what you claim.....)))

 
sever29 >> :

There! Investors! Taste... Is that the motto of your SPAMM?


No.

Our motto: "Profit is nothing - stability is everything!" :)