Is there a need for a lock in MT5?
LOC is necessary!
In mt5, NO!, because there will be troubles where lock cannot be in principle.
In mt5, YES! If it will be a pure dealing, and there will be an opportunity to "switch" the system of accounting.
:)))
It's not worth mentioning, we are talking about different things...
Who told you that this logic would not work on 5
What else I want to say. Loki does not need DCs, they need people to bring in money and only come back when you bring in money again. For this they need nice programs, to puff up cheeks and justify the uselessness of what is really needed. They (brokerage companies) will teach us to use thousands of indicators and they will teach us to lose deposits. In fact, lots allow you to create break-even TP. That's why the war with them began.
Although it is possible to create an absolutely no indicators with such characteristics.
| Symbol | EURUSD (Euro vs US Dollar) | ||||
| Period | 1 Minute (M1) 2009.03.20 00:00 - 2009.07.21 23:59 (2009.03.20 - 2009.07.22) | ||||
| Model | All ticks (most accurate method based on all smallest available timeframes) | ||||
| Parameters | Lot=0.1 | ||||
| Bars in history | 124237 | Modelled ticks | 4910683 | Modeling quality | 25.00% |
| Chart mismatch errors | 0 | ||||
| Initial deposit | 100000.00 | ||||
| Net profit | 749.24 | Total profit | 749.24 | Total loss | 0.00 |
| Profitability | Expected payoff | 20.81 | |||
| Absolute drawdown | 149.48 | Maximum drawdown | 239.97 (0.24%) | Relative drawdown | 0.24% (239.97) |
| Total trades | 36 | Short positions (% win) | 18 (100.00%) | Long positions (% win) | 18 (100.00%) |
| Profitable trades (% of all) | 36 (100.00%) | Loss trades (% of all) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
| Largest | profitable trade | 22.82 | Deal with loss | 0.00 | |
| Average | profitable deal | 20.81 | Deal loss | 0.00 | |
| Maximum number | continuous wins (profit) | 36 (749.24) | Continuous losses (loss) | 0 (0.00) | |
| Maximum | Continuous Profit (number of wins) | 749.24 (36) | Continuous loss (number of losses) | 0.00 (0) | |
| Average | continuous winnings | 36 | Continuous loss | 0 | |
All over the forum in different threads the same question is being discussed with many others on MT5. Maybe discuss one specific one in one thread?
Here's part of the report(the whole report would open the logic) of an EA based ONLY on LOCK. I.e. BOTH positions open at once. Your move opponents locs.
Let's say that if after any lock, OrderCloseBy() would be automatically triggered on the server, it would be much better. The lock itself isn't needed - it's useless. But a quick reverse is not very fast in MT4 because after locking it needs to close at the opposite one, i.e. it puts extra strain on the algorithm. Especially, if OrderCloseBy() for some reason does not work at once, at the next call of start() it needs to find a pair of ticks for the opposite one and try to close again. And so on and so forth.
Reshetov писал(а) >>
...
Especially, if OrderCloseBy() for some reason does not work at once, then at next call of start() it is necessary to find a couple of tickets for counter and try to overlap again. And so on and so forth.
Sorry, what's the rush?
;)
Well, the next one, ten ticks from now...
The possibility or impossibility of locks has nothing to do with the terminal, it has to do with the rules of trading set by the brokerage company.
Report - all the same can be obtained without opening two orders in one direction at once, if you think about it a little bit - you can do with one order.
By the way, manually in netting (in mt5 for short, in 5)
You can't turn over very fast either, you have to type or enter a double volume, press a button...
The possibility or impossibility of locks has nothing to do with the terminal, it has to do with the rules of trading set by the brokerage company.
>> Report - all the same can be done without opening two orders in one line.
And is there an example of that?
And with these. Here, the lock is virtual, spread across EAs (i.e. another EA opens a locking position, for more correct operation)... Pay attention to the number of losing trades
| Symbol | EURUSD (Euro vs US Dollar) | ||||
| Period | 5 Minutes (M5) 1999.09.01 09:45 - 2009.08.19 10:25 | ||||
| Model | All ticks (most accurate method based on all smallest timeframes available) | ||||
| Parameters | DistanceSet=1200; MaksOrders=3; StopLoss=55000; DinamicStopLoss=false; WEB=true; PAT_UP=0.2; UpTrend=true; OrdersComment="--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------"; downTrend=false; MaksOrdersDW=18; Lot=0.1; DinamicStopLossDW=false; WEBDW=true; Timehourstart=13; Timeminutstart=10; Timehourstop=22; DeleteOrder=true; TimeOpen=true; | ||||
| Bars in history | 738951 | Modelled ticks | 29987475 | Simulation quality | 89.99% |
| Chart mismatch errors | 1 | ||||
| Initial deposit | 1000.00 | ||||
| Net profit | 3414.07 | Total profit | 3414.07 | Total loss | 0.00 |
| Profitability | Expected payoff | 23.87 | |||
| Absolute drawdown | 16.80 | Maximum drawdown | 431.88 (12.91%) | Relative drawdown | 12.91% (431.88) |
| Total trades | 143 | Short positions (% win) | 0 (0.00%) | Long positions (% win) | 143 (100.00%) |
| Profitable trades (% of all) | 143 (100.00%) | Loss trades (% of all) | 0 (0.00%) | ||
| Largest | profitable trade | 24.00 | losing trade | 0.00 | |
| Average | profitable deal | 23.87 | Deal loss | 0.00 | |
| Maximum number | continuous wins (profit) | 143 (3414.07) | Continuous losses (loss) | 0 (0.00) | |
| Maximum | Continuous profits (number of wins) | 3414.07 (143) | Continuous loss (number of losses) | 0.00 (0) | |
| Average | continuous winnings | 143 | Continuous loss | 0 | |
By the way, manually in netting (in mt5 for short, in 5)
You can't turn over very quickly, you have to type or enter a double volume, press the button...
We should ask the developers to introduce an "x2" button next to the field.
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
All over the forum in different threads the same question is being discussed with many others on MT5. Maybe discuss one specific one in one thread?
Here's part of the report(the whole report would open the logic) of an EA based ONLY on LOCK. I.e. BOTH positions open at once. Your move opposes the locs.