The second sacred cow: "Grow profits, cut losses" - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
If you follow this principle, you can get the following results:
Longs on EUR/USD in the area 2008.07.01 00:00 - 2010.09.03. MO-45.
Pyramiding is applied.
If you follow this principle, you can get the following results:
Longs on EUR/USD in the area 2008.07.01 00:00 - 2010.09.03. MO-45.
Pyramiding is applied.
As long as I am interested in Forex, I have not met a profitable trend expert.
An interesting fellow wrote an article here: http://pratrader.livejournal.com/176779.html
And he revealed at least one grail there - just in relation to trends. The catch is that a trend: a) is not always appears with sufficient force; b) is able to be squeezed; c) (grail! :) ) it can be measured.
And the 2006-2007 sliff?
No, but not a fountain either. The losing sectors correspond to long-term bearish trends (on these trends the shorts prevail, but I'm not testing both at the same time, because the TS giving the best results for longs compared to other TS, respectively, should give better results for shorts, though not always).
The Expert Advisor is trendy, 2006-7 are bullish, so longs should in principle bring profit to any TS in this area.
This advisor has an equity level involved in generating a signal to close positions, which is bad, and there are more profitable methods, I've been looking through the options for a month now.
In the previous post I showed the model I am striving for, which is exactly how an EA should drain: smoothly and gently, and take everything from the trend! Although I used to think this model was ideal, as well as the longs of 99-2010
I will not speculate on my own opinion.
The main question is this: where in life did this sacred platitude come from? A simple analysis of the reasons for this harsh truth can lead to unexpected conclusions.
In my opinion, this is one of the tactics of trend-following. The more points of profit, the bigger the allowable pullback. For example in Dserg's "Pivot Swap".
And this guy doesn't think about closing :) by the 6 figure account, we understand that the account is real. Greed as a vice? or is it really meant to be?
And this guy doesn't think about closing :) by the 6 figure account, we understand that the account is real. Greed as a vice? or is it really meant to be?
Why "greed"? Why "vice"? He has a stop set, goes 'wrong', everything closes.
Why "greed"? Why "vice"? He's got a stop set, goes "wrong", everything closes.
I know him since school, he uses trading on forex exclusively as a slot machine, he can make deposit several times a day, he trades interventions, I caught him today :)
I have offered to make a strategy a hundred times, he cannot give out the TOR, I ask him how..... says, interesting chart, downs - withdrawal of money from the account, the last 300,000 is not yet fixed