"Trees don't grow to the sky" - page 20

 
faa1947:

Let him indicate the interval at which this profit was made.
Specify ANY interval this year (no history of the past) I will run it with different settings... sorry, forgot to switch again...
 
Mischek:

pointless, Slava has been honing his fitting skills for several years, with a persistence that is baffling
and why exactly the fitting ? this Expert Advisor is quite resistant to different settings... ( as well as to dept size and lot size ... as long as the dept isn't smaller than minimum lot and the lot isn't larger than dept size ... ) )
 

Here's a test for August where each trade was fully in cash at the time of opening..:


Initial deposit 100.00
Net profit 9269.34
Total profit 10472.94
Total loss -1203.60
Profitability 8.70
Expected payoff 205.99
Absolute drawdown 3.00
Maximum drawdown 1290.40 (13.16%)
Relative drawdown 42.02% (391.06)
Total trades 45
Short positions (% win) 29 (72.41%)
Long positions (% win) 16 (75.00%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 33 (73.33%)
Loss trades (% of all) 12 (26.67%)
Largest
largest profitable trade 2421.98
losing trade -180.40
Average
317.36 profitable deal
losing trade -100.30
Maximum number
continuous wins (profit) 10 (8235.22)
Continuous Losses (Loss) 3 (-475.60)
Maximum
Continuous Profit (number of wins) 8235.22 (10)
Continuous loss (number of losses) -475.60 (3)
Average
continuous winnings 4
Continuous loss 2
 
The Expert Advisor is the simplest... on one wrist and price... The point is that stoploss is as low as possible ( loss-making ones are closed with min. losses) and profitable ones are spent...
Files:
 
sllawa3:
The Expert Advisor is the simplest... on a single swing arm and price... The point is that stoploss is as low as possible ( loss-making ones are closed with min. losses) and profitable ones are spent...
The tester can do better.
 
khorosh:
You can do better in the tester.
Why "make it" ! I just run it in the tester on the history... and as I said above with absolutely different settings... without any optimizations or adjustments...
 

here is the same test with constant minimum lot


Initial deposit 100.00
Net profit 18.30
Total profit 23.10
Total loss -4.80
Profitability 4.81
Expectation of winning 0.41
Absolute drawdown 0.10
Maximum drawdown 1.74 (1.59%)
Relative drawdown 1.59% (1.74)
Total trades 45
Short positions (% win) 29 (72.41%)
Long positions (% win) 16 (75.00%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 33 (73.33%)
Losses (% of all) 12 (26.
67%)
Largest
profitable trade 2.18
losing trade -0.40
Average
profitable trade 0.70
losing trade -0.40
Maximum
continuous wins (profit) 10 (7.85)
continuous losses (loss) 3 (-1.20)
Maximum
continuous gains (number of wins) 7.85 (10)
continuous losses (number of losses) -1.20 (3)
Average
continuous wins 4 xml-ph-0014@deepl.inte
 
sllawa3:
... ...with a wide variety of settings... without any optimisation or tweaking...
 
The only drawback of the Expert Advisor is a long wait for a trade ... sometimes a week may not happen ... or a week to go in the red (small because close stops do not allow much) but as seen in tests, the average statistical Expert Advisor is quite profitable ...
 
sllawa3:
the expert is the simplest... on one machine and the price...
Can you be a little more specific?