NFA bans locking from 15 May 2009 - page 41

New comment
 

Oh, I got that one. What I do not understand is this:

Но ошибся, что нельзя сразу после срабатывания лимитника поставить стандартны тэйк ближе StopLevel. Можно.

Not if the price has not moved away from the price at which the order was triggered, because the stoplevel for TP is not calculated from the order price, but from the current price. Right?

 

The value of the current has been calculated as follows:

OrderTakeProfit() - OrderOpenPrice();
For limiters this value cannot be less than StopLevel. But at the moment of opening, it can be changed to a lower value.
 
Not at the moment, but afterwards. And only on condition that the price has gone against the position, thereby moving away by more than the StopLevel.
 

Example:

- Spread = 8 (fix), StopLevel = 20;

- BUYLIMIT with OpenPrice == 1.5020, TakeProfit == 1.5040 (no less is possible due to StopLevel);

- Ask price reached the level 1.5020 (Bid == 1.5012) - the Limiter triggered;

- the next tick is one pip higher: Bid == 1.5013;

- on this tick I change the TakeProfit of the open position to Bid + StopLevel == 1.5033.

Total:

OrderTakeProfit() - OrderOpenPrice() == 13, which is less than StopLevel.

 
Ah, now I get it definitively. =)

Only, it's not closer than StopLevel. This, when creating a limit (or when opening from the market), TP cannot be placed closer than StopLevel + spread, but after triggering it can be moved by -spread, but no closer than StopLevel.
 
komposter >> :

I noticed everything.

And it was your posts that caused the reaction.


You shouldn't have said anything, Helen. You had something to say, why did you stop?

Read the thread, read your opinion, conclusion: hot. Technically literate, professionally savvy. But it begs the question, millionaire? No? Why not? In the tester is not a one-time millionaire, no Billionaire! And what prevents one from becoming a millionaire in the market? Do not forget about the psychology! I am not talking about the psychology of the trader with his excitement, I am talking about the psychology of business. On the other side of the "table" is not another trader, who has bet on the "BUY" against your "SELL"? On the other side of the KAZI DC. And always has been! IS! and WILL! "The one who pays, the one who dances the girl!
The new MT5 platform! For Comfortable Trader's Work? For the successful playing of the DC! Who pays for the development of the new platform? Raise your hands? They will make a colorful terminal for a trader! But for me, for example, the result is more important, not the deceptive beauty of the tool. The new rules of the game are dictated by DCs, and this will be reflected in the new platform. It looks ridiculous and naive that brokerage companies, with the ban of lots, give up their tiny spread in favor of a trader! :))) And you and I have only to "fight" with happiness or with "grief" ... :)
One thing is pleasant that the principle "There is always a belt for a sly ass" has not been annulled. The proof of this is relevant discussions, for example, here: <a href="https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/116821" target="_blank" title="\">"Data exchange between two Expert Advisors working in different terminals" </a><br /> And while we are "screwing" - we will be screwed... :) <br /> Traders of all brokerage companies unite! (bad dream) ;)<br /> <br /> <br /></p>.

 
What is the difference between a kitchen and a casino? The answer is nothing! The difference between the real market and the kitchen is that in the kitchen (in the casino), everything is done to make the player lose, the trader plays against the kitchen instead of trading in the market. And what about those who have found a way to win? For these measures, most casinos have links and a common database of who is winning and by what means. Then measures are taken to eliminate profits over a long period of time (there is also a dependency on Profit Sums). In the end, all the cooks get together and decide how to reduce the profitability of those 5% to as low as possible. Actually, there is no need to explain what I mean. We have already seen everything very well. For N-number of years a good base of those who make a profit and how, then under the guise of new developments and beautiful illusion, cut those funds, with which these 5% made profit. But most sit under the illusion that at the moment their rival and at the same time ally is the market and not the Kitchen. That's the scariest difference between the Casino and the Kitchen chain, in a casino everyone knows they can't make a profit for a long period of time, which makes them wonder if they should. And here the illusion hovers that all the pre-market kitchens will let them make a profit over a long period of time. The principle of kitchens and casinos is the same, only the casino mechanism was fine-tuned much earlier than the kitchens. And kitchens are just little brothers - casinos that use the accumulated experience of their big brothers. Why am I saying all this? Because we can already see that the first genocide against traders (that is, those who treat trading as trading and trading on the plus side) has started. To leave only those who believe in this illusion, profiting from means not prohibited by the Kitchens. And those who find a loophole here too will be slaughtered by the 2nd wave of genocide, under the pretext of concern for traders and their welfare, covering themselves with pretty pictures and manipulating clever words. :)))))) But as they say in that adage: For every sly ass...... there is a plug with a thread. This is me talking about the pre-market kitchen empire. Everything they do for traders is to the contrary against - the trader! There is another difference between a kitchen player and a casino player. The kitchen player has much more means to get around the rules set by the kitcheners. As they say with a crowbar, the cunning of the cooks is as good as the cunning of the players. The only question is? When will all this mess stop and there will be a REAL TRADER-MARKET TRADING AND NOT ANY KUHARSKY BOOKS? Until this question is answered - the player (trader in mind) can forget about a prosperous future on a long-term basis or continue to feed on the illusion that he is a trader, and not a player against the cooperators. Good luck! :-)
 

"Here Ostap gave such a long compliment that he couldn't even finish it" I. Ilf and E. Petrov

You will not find all restaurants and you will find them.

If you want to be sure you are not looking for a gypsy shop then I advise American companies with initial deposits starting from $ 5 million.

If you do not want to be sure, look for the American companies and recommend them as start-up companies with initial deposits of $ 5 million.

These guys are so connected that if anything happens, they can send an aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf.

So good luck.

 
MrSerj >> :
The only question is? When will all this mess stop and there will be a REAL TRADER-MARKET TRADING AND NOT ANY KUHARSKY BOOKS? Until this question is answered - a player (trader in mind) can forget about a prosperous future on a long term basis or continue to feed on the illusion of being a trader, and not a player against the Kuchar girls. Good luck! :-)

"The mice begged and cried, but kept on eating cactus" (c).

"Kitchen mayhem" for you personally will stop as soon as you stop carrying your money to kitchen DCs.

 

MrSerj писал(а) >>
. А тех, кто найдет и здесь лазейку 2-й волной геноцида зарубят, под предлогом озабоченности о трейдерах и их благополучии, прикрываясь красивыми картинками и манипулируя умными словами.....

the player (in the trader's mind) can forget about a prosperous future on a long-term basis or continue to feed on the illusion that he is a trader and not a player against the kuchariki. Good luck! :-)

That's exactly the way you should approach your work from the beginning.

I made it clear a long time ago that I work against the kitchens. All the time. And I've even developed methods that sometimes minimize my sneaky kitchen tricks...

And I can't do it any other way with my capital. I do not have $ 5 million to deposit it in a decent office with an aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf.

I do not count the sneaky tricks of the brokerage companies.

We all remember the massive spread increase at the beginning of the year on "overnight" pips. This was hypocritically explained by concern for traders or allegedly "tricks" of quotes' providers.

Requotes, constant slippage towards the worse, the server "freezing" at the most inopportune moments, the "2-minute rule", the so-called "gap mode". "Gap mode", ostentatious quotation filtering, mean conditions of Service Providers' Rules (disguised by empty phrases), special "non-market" quotes (for further cancellation of transactions), obvious losing stops (hoping that not every trader will complain), - just to name a few...

1...343536373839404142434445
New comment